[Resolved]  Shree Om Sai Nath Car On Rent — Why one should give Affidavit of Support/Declaration for Support

As per Court hearing details 8th March 2010 & 11th March 2010

The Judge has clearly directed the police/eow to submit the charge sheet by 18th March 2010 (next hearing date) or he will take an appropriate decision to give bail or dismiss the case.

Today the Judge has categorically mentioned that all those who have made complaints any where in India & has already received the invested amount in 13-18 months of repayment can not make any claim. Those who have given affidavit of support and/or Declaration of Support will definitely be getting their returns/profit/compensation pm as per contract/agreement for rest of the period of 60 months. Those who have not given any Affidavit of support or Declaration for support can give the same at the earliest before next hearing or otherwise can make complaint if they so wish.

As per Mumbai Court

The prosecution said that they had visited his house but it had a digital lock. The police had asked for permission & time to take Roopesh Verma to the house to have the digital lock opened by him. The Advocate of Roopesh Verma said that his client is not in a position to do anything about making payments because all his accounts are seized.

Why one should give Affidavit/Declaration of/for Support

1. As now it is clear that the court has made a note of it of the support extended to Mr. Verma through Affidavit of Support/Declaration for Support and it has been also made basis to give returns/profit/compensation to the investors as & when things finalizes.

2. Those who have made complaints/want to make complaints but has already received the invested amount back in 13-18 months period cannot make any claim or otherwise have to wait for the company to restart & the company will take appropriate business decision at that time.

3. Mr. Dharmendar Arya has submitted Balance Sheet, Profit & loss A/c (Audited as per Governments requirement) of last year & Advance payment of Tax 09-10 (September 09) to the court which has high net worth of 300 crores & surplus cash flow to take care needs of investors payment. Even they have pm turnover of 10-15 crores from resorts, car rentals & allied business. That means the companies financial position is strong & Mr. Verma is willing to pay the investors their dues as given in writing to the court for the bail.

4. SOSN as per Media/EOW report has 1780 luxury cars, 24 crore cash, 24 co. bank account, 10-20 hotels/resorts across country & co.s like Sai Cine vision, Sai construction co., Swiss cabs, Swiss Music, Shree Resorts, Sai Airways (planned) + planning of right issue/IPO. etc. The chances of closing down the business are very remote as the court may/will appoint a observer to monitor the functioning of sosn.

5. The Judge has directed the police/eow to submit the charge sheet by 18th March 2010 (next hearing date) or he will take an appropriate decision to give bail or dismiss the case. That means as the interrogation is complete in Delhi and the chances of bail is very high if no charge sheet is presented by all means Mr. Verma might be out of the custody & start his business as usual.

Decide now as it could be a last chance to show your solidarity and/or registering your claim in court of return/profit/compensation per month as per contract/agreement for rest of the period of 60 months.

DECLARATION

I, ________________________________________________ _ son/ daughter/ wife of

_____________________________________________ age _____ years Resident of

________________________________________________ ____________________

_________________________________________________ ____________________

___________________issued PAN Card/Driving License/Passport/Government/PSU

/Other approved ID Card/ Election Commission ID card number _________________

as Identity (copy attached herewith) do hereby solemnly affirm & declare as under:-


1. That I have invested Rs._____________/- (Rupees____________________________

_______only) in the Car Plan/ Resort Membership Plan in the company of Shree Om

Sainath Car On Rent Ltd. located at _____________________________, vide receipt

no(s). _________________________________ dated _________________________

and entered into an agreement dated ________________________ for sixty months.

2. That I have received the agreed amount/ compensation continuously since the date of agreement till November 2009 as per terms & conditions of the agreement.

3. That I am satisfied with the company & want to continue the agreement if the agreed amount is to be made by the company continuously in future till the expiry of the contract.


I hereby state that the contents of the above Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge & nothing material has been concealed therefrom.


Deponent

Date:

Place:

Witness:
Signature (& seal if any)

Name:

Complete Address:
Was this information helpful?
No (0)
Yes (0)
Aug 13, 2020
Complaint marked as Resolved 
Complaint comments 

Comments

DECLARATION

I, __Bishwanath Ghsoh__________________________________ _ son/ of

_____Late Suresh Ghsoh______________________ age __46_ years Resident of

____#17, 4th CROSS, VIVEKANANDA LAYOUT, MARUTHI NAGAR

______YELAHANKA POST BANGALORE KARNATAK PIN - 560064________

___________________issued PAN Card/Driving License/Passport/Government/PSU

/Other approved ID Card/ Election Commission ID card number __PAN CARD NO AEMPG8277P

as Identity (copy attached herewith) do hereby solemnly affirm & declare as under:-


1. That I have invested Rs.___1, 49, 000__/- (Rupees_____ONE LAKH FORTYNINE THHOUSAND

_______only) in the Car Plan/ Resort Membership Plan in the company of Shree Om

Sainath Car On Rent Ltd. located at ___BANGALORE_________________, vide receipt

no(s). ______40654______________________ dated ______[protected]__________

and entered into an agreement dated ____[protected]__________ for sixty months.

2. That I have received the agreed amount/ compensation continuously since the date of agreement till November 2009 as per terms & conditions of the agreement.

3. That I am satisfied with the company & want to continue the agreement if the agreed amount is to be made by the company continuously in future till the expiry of the contract.


I hereby state that the contents of the above Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge & nothing material has been concealed therefrom.


Deponent BISHWANATH GHOSH

Date: 16 AUG 2010

Place: BANGALORE

Witness:
Signature (& seal if any)

Name:

Complete Address:
DECLARATION

I, _JAYENDRA KUMAR SHARMA son of RAM CHANDRA SHARMA age 41 years Resident of :
4A/94 Sidhatri enclave
Mohan Garden
New Delhi-110059.issued PAN Card/Driving License/Passport/Government/PSU

/Other approved ID Card/ Election Commission ID card number _________________

as Identity (copy attached herewith) do hereby solemnly affirm & declare as under:-


1. That I have invested Rs.120000X2=240000/-
only) in the Resort Membership Plan in the company of Shree Om

Sainath Car On Rent Ltd. located at NAVRANG HOUSE CANOUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI vide receipt no(s). 20481 dated 18 Oct 2008 &
Rs 1, 20000/- vide receipt no.22774 dated 05 Nov 2008

and entered into an agreement dated 18 Oct 2008 &
vide receipt no.22774 dated 05 Nov 2008 for sixty months.

2. That I have received the agreed amount/ compensation continuously since the date of agreement till November 2009 as per terms & conditions of the agreement.

3. That I am satisfied with the company & want to continue the agreement if the agreed amount is to be made by the company continuously in future till the expiry of the contract.


I hereby state that the contents of the above Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge & nothing material has been concealed therefrom.


Deponent:JAYENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

Date:16 MARCH 2010

Place:NEW DELHI

Witness:
Signature (& seal if any)

Name:

Complete Address:
why they give court affidavidate
ithink all employee all equl punishable for the fraud of company they know that they r doing by order of onwer of the company are not legal work.
i want to know when tyey issue the affidaviate on which behafe
Dear Investor Friend,

We are in the process of making database of investors in each sosn centre cities the data will contain

1. Name
2. City of Residence/Investment,
3. Email ID
4. Telephone No.(If one does not want to give telephone no. their is no compulsion).

This details will be circulated among other investors all across India for a free & fair interaction by emails or by telephone, if no. is given to share the information o[censored]se & then if investors decide they can move forward to make a forum for further action & decision at their end.

We would only be able to act as a mentor as of now but very soon we will take the appropriate action in the favour of the investors cause.

If you would like to be apart of the forum in your city, do send the above details for further planning & action.

Thanks

[protected]@gmail.com
Invester:-
VIRPAL JAMAN SINGH THAKUR,

NAGPUR MAHARASHTRA,

[protected]@yahoo.co.in,

[protected].
We have received this Email from our investor member:

My dear all Investor's,
WHY RS. 15 CRORES should be used to clear the dues of Delhi Investor's only. It will be a sheer injustice with other investor across India. Why the sosn company is not putting the detail's of all the investor's across India before the Hon'ble court. In my view the total balance invested money of the investor's across India should be calculated, then the asset's and cash with the co. After then it can be decided by the court that what should be the way to protect's / return the fund's invested by the crying investor's throughout India, and if this thing is not taken into consideration then it will be a blot in the name of justice. So it's my request to all investor's across India that in every city where the sosn co. was running his business one DEDICATED PERSON should come forward along with the data of the Investor's of his city. In this way the total balance INVESTED MONEY can be calculated. So be hurry and don't waste the time till then from every city a request should be forwarded by the POLICE/EOW to the Delhi Court before Hon'ble Judge Mr. S.P.GARG not to grant any bail .
R.K.Nigam ( Lucknow) (m) [protected]

We support the above mentioned statement & request everybody across sosn centre city/state to select representatives to lead them bring justice to the cause of the investors.
Those who are interested may send an email to us so the same can be circulated among investors & an Investors Forum can be formed.

Sosn Investors Forum
0 minutes ago by rajendra kumar nigam [send email]
R.K.Nigam ( m) [protected]
13 minutes ago by rajendra kumar nigam [send email]
Fw: Court hearing details 7th September 10
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: [protected]@gmail.com


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, 8 September, 2010 10:31:59 PM
Subject: Court hearing details 7th September 10

Dear Investor Friends,

We are thankful to Mr. Anil for providing info on the court hearing held on 7th September 10. Further to add a settlement formula has been made by the complainants & Mr. Rv lawyers which as per the committee to be formed under the Chairmanship of a Retired Judge Justice Chopra will receive the suggestions & objections to the settlement procedure of distributing balance amount of principal amount amongst the Investors. As mentioned the Committee will comprise of lawyers (both parties) Representatives from SOSN, EOW and elected representative from the Investors Forum (If any).

The only lacuna is that in the absence of any elected representative from Investors Forum (which is not formed any where in the country, if any we are not aware) will certainly going to harm the interest of investors at large. We are also susceptible of non-investors and even persons with vested interest taking the advantage of the same & harming the interest of genuine investors.

As there was a request by the complainant's lawyers to cater to the need of their clients first but not accepted by the judge will again try to press their demands in the committee (which they are going to be members of). We request eminent personalities from varied facade of society having good standing & if have invested amount in SOSN to come forward & take the challenge of getting a true and empathetic settlement & justice to the affected investors brother n.

The court does not have any reservations to Mr. Rv running the company after getting bail & taking investors into confidence as there was no cheating, embezzlement of funds and criminal conspiracy on the part of Mr. Rv & co. only some overzealous investors with the connivance of some lawyers has got him arrested & rest is history. Mr. Rv & team is also of the same opinion as everything was very much legal & as per the law of the land.

Mr. Rv is expected to get bail within the next one to two hearings following the formation of the committee & execution of the settlement procedure. Nexthearing is on 9th September 2010.

Sosn Investors Forum
11 minutes ago by rajendra kumar nigam [send email]
Fw: Court hearing details 9th September 10
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: [protected]@gmail.com


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, 10 September, 2010 11:27:43 PM
Subject: Court hearing details 9th September 10

We are thankful to our Investor Members like Mr. Anil & Mr. Manoj who have taken up the cause of providing details of the hearing of sosn case & are also trying to support investors to form a group to help Investors across India.

First the details of the hearing; as the time given was 2.30 pm most of the investors, I.O., Mr. Rvs & Mr. Av lawyers were outside the court room discussing modalities of getting bail to Mr. Rv & exercising restrain on the onslaught by some of the complainant’s lawyers.

Finding it an opportunity, some of the complainant’s lawyers presented their case first in the court without waiting for rest to join & openly challenged the chances of Mr. Rv getting bail on the ground of ready to pay the amount available with the court to the investors & not to their clients first also they started objecting to the MOU made wherein Retd. Judge Mr. RC Chopra would head the committee & not finding their names as committee members.

Mean while rest of the complainant’s lawyers joined & they started fighting among themselves who should get the amount first by becoming the member of the committee based on nos. of clients they represent and to divert the attention from the merit of the arguments of bail & instead they even claimed the session court does not have authority/jurisdiction to appoint/direct the Retd. Judge Mr. Chopra to head the committee & report to court on the progress time & on.

By then the lawyers Mr. Rv & Mr. Av Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. JS Chowdhary & Mr. Aman Sareen joined but as most of the damages were done they were not able to persuade Judge Mr. Garg to grant interim bail as even some complainant’s lawyers claimed that Mr. Rv will run off & all the amount confiscated by the court will get forfeited till Mr. Rv is rearrested no point giving him bail now.

The Judge finding it tough on many issues kept his judgment on bail reserved till the issue of forming the committee & repayment of amount to the investors start & transferred the case back to the trial court for the same though suggesting that he will recommend the lower court to bypass earlier objections it had & look the same in a fresh & positive manner.

The next hearing date is 13th September 10 & will be in the lower court at 2 pm.

Sosn Investors Forum

Disclaimer. Sosn Investor Forum is only extending an voluntary service in the interest of investors and irrespective of all efforts been made to provide authentic; true and correct information; cannot guarantee the same nor does it provide any professional; legal; financial advice. It is individuals and readers own prerogative to Interpret & understand at their own level.
9 minutes ago by rajendra kumar nigam [send email]
Fw: Members support for representation
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: [protected]@gmail.com


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Sun, 12 September, 2010 5:15:06 PM
Subject: Members support for representation

We have received this Email from our investor member:

My dear all Investor's,
WHY RS. 15 CRORES should be used to clear the dues of Delhi Investor's only. It will be a sheer injustice with other investor across India. Why the sosn company is not putting the detail's of all the investor's across India before the Hon'ble court. In my view the total balance invested money of the investor's across India should be calculated, then the asset's and cash with the co. After then it can be decided by the court that what should be the way to protect's / return the fund's invested by the crying investor's throughout India, and if this thing is not taken into consideration then it will be a blot in the name of justice. So it's my request to all investor's across India that in every city where the sosn co. was running his business one DEDICATED PERSON should come forward along with the data of the Investor's of his city. In this way the total balance INVESTED MONEY can be calculated. So be hurry and don't waste the time till then from every city a request should be forwarded by the POLICE/EOW to the Delhi Court before Hon'ble Judge Mr. S.P.GARG not to grant any bail .
R.K.Nigam ( Lucknow) (m) [protected]

We support the above mentioned statement & request everybody across sosn centre city/state to select representatives to lead them bring justice to the cause of the investors.
Those who are interested may send an email to us so the same can be circulated among investors & an Investors Forum can be formed.

Sosn Investors Forum
Re: Court hearing details 13th & 15th September 10
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
TO ALL MY INVESTOR FRIEND'S ACROSS INDIDIA,
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO SEEK HIGH COURT STAY.
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 16 September, 2010 10:47:17 PM
Subject: Court hearing details 13th & 15th September 10

We are thankful to Mr. Anil, Mr. Manoj Kumar & others for the update for rest of the investors community. As Justice S P Garg reserved his decision on the bail plea of Mr. Rv finding it difficult unless & until the investors start receiving their payments under a committee he had recommended to over look the earlier basis for rejection of bail by the lower court & suggest to form the committee under Justice R C Chopra.

The court on 13th September decided to extend a passionate hearing to the cause of bail to Mr. Rv & heard the lawyers of both the accused & victim & reciprocated in a positive manner. The lawyers were better behaved & seems to have got into understanding that unless & until the investors start receiving some money bail to Mr. Rv is not possible.

Justice Ajay Pandey was of the view that the court should be apprised where is the money available & how it will be paid. The IO of EOW was unable to confirm how much unfettered amount is available & sought time for the same to be confirmed from the bank & requested for orders by the judge to the bank official to present the same in the court which by Judge order can be released to the investors at the earliest. The order was made for the same.

Mr. Rvs lawyer informed about around Rs.15-18 Cr. Plus various properties like one in Lucknow costing 3 Cr.+ 2 resort/hotel in Gurgaon of value 18 Cr.+ and various properties across India owned by sosn/Rv etc. and Rs.9.5 crores in IOB Mumbai which can be used to repay. The court suggested only the properties & money under their jurisdiction will be used.

There were persons from Pune group representing 1500+ investors & tried to place their list of the same to the court, the court suggested them to approach Mumbai court for the same & said any procedure followed at Delhi court will be a precedent & the order could be presented in courts in other cities for the same kind of relief. And sosn/Mr. Rv has sufficient money & assets for the same.

The court kept other hearing date as 15th September 10.

The court granted interim bail to Mr. Amit Verma against two surities of Rs. 50 lakh each, to arrange for Rs.10 to 40 Cr. Within 25 days, so the money can be given to the investors by the committee under the chairmanship of Justice R C Chopra. If the same cannot be completed in time then any further bail would not be granted to any body & the case will run for normal course.

The court has kept 13th October 10 for the next hearing.

Disclaimer. Sosn Investor Forum is only extending an voluntary service in the interest of investors and irrespective of all efforts been made to provide authentic; true and correct information; cannot guarantee the same nor does it provide any professional; legal; financial advice. It is individuals and readers own prerogative to Interpret & understand at their own level.

Post your Comment

    I want to submit Complaint Positive Review Neutral Comment
    code
    By clicking Submit you agree to our Terms of Use
    Submit

    Contact Information

    India
    File a Complaint