The question 2, (B) part asked for two books of dadabhai naoroji which explained drain theory.
But according to the scope of syllabus given by icse officially, the students were supposed to know "any two contributions of dadabhai naoroji". Here the question asked included a particular contribution, regarding his books. This is quite irresponsible from a reputed board. How can out of syllabus questions be asked clearly contrasting with the scope of syllabus? The board must not back off from their words and must correct such an act of irresponsibility. If the paper is not set according to the scope of syllabus then why is it given? Why is it put up on the website and everywhere?
Hope the board will act responsibly from now and correct this issue by giving grace marks to the students, officially, in q2 (B). Was this information helpful? |