Gownholic — product detail

A

ameena ashraf

from Mandya, Karnataka

Website:

Gownholic

Sir, i have ordered a designer party gown from gownholic which i got delivered was completely different from what i ordered. Cheap material and even the colour is not same. The pattern is not even same, it's simply plain cheap material which is not even worth for the money i paid. Kindly take into notice this matter and do something so i can return the product and get refund. Thank you.

Was this information helpful?

No (0)

Yes (0)

Jul 30, 2018

Updated by ameena ashraf Sir, i have ordered a designer gown from gownholic for which i got 2 cheap dupattas. I am really disappointed with the product.in fact it is not even same and the colour is entirely different. The product is really cheap and it is not what i ordered. You guys are cheating the customers. I want to return the product i recieved and i need a refund. You guys cannot do this to the customers. We are paying for the products so we need what we ordered not something else. Please refund my money.

Related reviews

View all 59 Reviews

Comments

M

Manideepika Deepu Komanduru

from Pithapuram, Andhra Pradesh

I ordered a dress and I recieved two sarees instead of that dress

Reply

L

Laxmi Chanti

from Bhimunipatnam, Andhra Pradesh

Cancell my order. Gownholic rating was very poor, and u are sending cheap sarees, cheap meterial,
way are you cheating like this,
I don't want that type of saree,
cancelle my order, order no 17721, . I was searched but cancellation policy not their, lz cancel my order, order no is 17721

Reply

D

dreamer1000

from Bengaluru, Karnataka

I too have ordered a gown from goenholic but I want to cancel my order after seeing the reviews.But they are not having a cancellation option.My order number is 51450.

Reply

S

sonali debnath

from Raipur, Chhattisgarh

I have ordered a gown from goenholic but I want to cancel my order after seeing the reviews.But they are not having a cancellation option and there is no coustmer care response My order no. 74171

Reply