Dec 27, 2020
Updated by Krishan101 FAQFAQ
Show search
Show menu
ADVERTISEMENT
Law & Civil Rights
Pacific International Lines
Pacific International Lines — Damages
Krishan101 on Dec 27, 2020Mark as Resolved
I am a victim of fraud and professional negligence crime of a Singaporean Government owned company. PIL has internal serial strategic theft stealing commercial assets by confiscating and dislocating my goods. Company refrain me from the information of my property. PIL have knowingly and intentionally created a crime of creating a false document, altering a document, for the illegal benefit of PIL's self-making the forgery.
Letter of Demand to PIL HQ
This letter serves as a formal and final request for repayment of $ 4, 132, 347.72, the unpaid balance that is owed for damages to my properties. These damages caused by you by a fraudulent confiscating my property assessing compensation is linked to the breach of fiduciary duties and duty of loyalty. Your cause of actions is deceit, breach of trust, Breach of contract, conversion and restitution.
This commercial trust is important in assessing damages for breach of which were caused by your actions while holding freight hostage of my Goods with three shipping containers.
Forged duplicate invoices were fabricated with the intention of stealing the cargo. Many times, Freight Forwarder of PIL issues / re-issues Bills of Lading with cargo miss-descriptions and deliberate over statement as to quantity laden, and a knowing miss-description of the cargo laden and therefore seek redress.
The costs of being a victim includes :
Direct Financial loss, reputation loss, loss of business opportunities, investment of time and resources to deal with a litigation, loss of life savings retirements.
Herewith is an estimate illustrate and consist of:
1. Nature of the commodity : Textile, readymade garments, home decor, furniture and misc.
2. Amount of goods and damages: Krishan Gupta consignor/seller :expenses to Export
3. Sea Worthy certificate 3 x $ 100 $ 300.00
4. Cost of one container $2500.00 X3 $ 7500.00
5. Cost of delivery one container from LA $ 1500.00 X 3 $ 4500.00
6. Labor loading costs of one container $ 2000.00 X 3 $ 6000.00
6. Goods in all three containers $ 33, 787.72
7. Documentation and other office expenses $ 2500.00
8. Putting Krishan Gupta out of business & life longs savings for retirement
$ 2, 000, 000.00
Total : $ 2, 054, 587.72
9. Amount of goods and damages : Cristine Baig : Consignee/Buyer :
Total : $ 2, 077, 760.00
10. Total losses : Total : $ 4, 132, 347.72
11. I do not know the condition of goods as they are containers.
All the containers are under the custody of PIL HQ Singapore.
12. Buyer refused to take the goods due to delay, dislocation of containers and
defamation of creditworthiness of business.
Several attempts to resolve this matter with you. You have ignored to response. Your staff Ms. Kareen Lee refrain to respond to me . All my goods and containers are under your custody, I am still the owner and the title holder of the goods with three shipping containers(SOC).
None of these contacts was reciprocated.
If this balance is not received in full by November 6, 2020, I will commence a legal action against you in Singapore Court of Justice.
Sincerely,
Krishan Gupta
E-mail : [protected]@msn.com
Briefing & facts on meritorious : Criminal Breach of trust
Singapore police Force FIR # CRM: 0137534 reply dated : October 06/2020 : 6.37 PM
Dear Mr. Wee Hian Huat Jackson
Manager Feedback Unit
Service Delivery Department
Singapore Police Force
Reference CRM # 0137534
Thank you so much for your reply and registering my case under your GRM # 0137534. Currently I am India living under the laws of Indian government in lockdown Covid-19.
Please note that this case requires your immediate aid and exigent action under these following circumstances:
1. Acts of Pacific International Lines, Singapore are "Egregious and outrageous abuse" with "breach of trust". Title of goods with all three shipping containers belongs to me.
Pacific International Lines's oppressive conduct is cruelty and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of my rights with gross negligence because the conduct complained of is so aggravated in a criminal character with serial evil evidences intent, wantonness, recklessness and malice.
Furthermore, I can point to evidences of malice where punitive damages must be awarded for tortious inference with prospective contracts putting "Krishan Gupta" out of business. A trade secret theft case can find malice from PIL Singapore efforts to keep their secret and defamatory statements have been made by PIL, Singapore and has failed to consult consignor on the consequences of inducing it's breach. Burden of proving the existence of an intentional evil-minded act can found in the trails of email correspondences.
2. Billing of lading : indicates that :Bill of Lading shall be construed as contractually applying " Hague Rules" and unless and until in the Bill of lading expressly amended by the protocol.
Para 31 of Bill of Lading indicates : Law and Jurisdiction
2 (a) : The contract evidenced hereby or contained herein shall be governed by Singapore
law.
(i) law governing the substantive contract (applicable law) is Singapore Government.
(ii) law governing the agreement to arbitrate, and the performance of that agreement (juridical seat or lex arbitri); is Singapore Government and
(iii) law governing the procedure of the arbitration (curial law) is Singapore Government.
3: Nothing herein shall prevent the parties to any claim and/or dispute under this Bill of Lading from agreeing to submit the claim and/or dispute to Singapore arbitration pursuant to the rules of the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (“SCMA”)
In case you need more clarification to proceed further in this case, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Krishan Gupta
From: K Gupta
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 12:59 PM
To: [protected]@police.gov.sg ; [protected]@spf.gov ; [protected]@spf.gov.sg ; [protected]@spf.gov.sg ; hoc.nairobi ; [protected]@ftgs.us
Cc: [protected]@court.go.ke ; [protected]@court.go.ke ; [protected]@kpa.co.ke
Subject: Complaint against Singaporean Government owned Company
Dear Sir,
I am a victim of fraud and professional negligence crime of a Singaporean Government owned company. PIL has internal serial strategic theft stealing commercial assets by confiscating and dislocating my goods. Company refrain me from the information of my property. PIL have knowingly and intentionally created a crime of creating a false document, altering a document, for the illegal benefit of PIL's self-making the forgery.
Briefing and facts:
Three Shipping containers owned by the consignor were shipped from Los Angeles to Mombasa, Kenya thru PIL ( pacific shipping lines).
Papers were approved and stamped by Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce
Dispute occurred by fabrication of duplicate invoices by the freight forwarder of PIL.
The original freight invoices were pre-paid in advance.
I was told that i do not need original B/L at the port of destination, as it will be done online digitally.
On knowledge through Mombasa PIL office Kenya, that original B/L are being held in PIL USA and they will not release the containers.
I filed a complaint in BBB (Better Business Bureau) and SFPD(San Francisco Police Department) for blackmailing.
PIL USA released the documents within few days to the destination port Mombasa, Kenya.
PIL HQ is refraining to reply regarding damages occurred during the period of cargo transection dispute.
PIL HQ is obligated to deliver all three containers with goods in good condition to the consignee.Consignor Mr.K.Gupta is title of ownership of container with goods up till date.
Consignee is not taking the consignment due to delay and Change of location without authorization.Consignee dis-location of containers is unacceptable. Asking for damages.
Your reply to this case is highly appreciated.
Thank you,
Krishan Gupta
1 Nature of the commodity : Textile, readymade garments, home decor, furniture and misc.
2. Amount of goods and damages: Krishan Gupta consignor/seller :expenses to Export
3. Sea Worthy certificate 3 x $ 100 $ 300.00
4. Cost of one container $2500.00 X3 $ 7500.00
5 Cost of delivery one container from LA $ 1500.00 X 3 $ 4500.00
6. Labor loading costs of one container $ 2000.00 X 3 $ 6000.00
7. Goods in all three containers $ 33, 787.72
8. Documentation and other office expenses $ 2500.00
9 Putting Krishan Gupta out of business & life longs savings for retirement $ 2, 000, 000.00
Total : $ 2, 054, 587.72
10 Amount of goods and damages : Cristine Baig : Consignee/Buyer : Total : $ 2, 077, 760.00
Total losses : Total : $ 4, 132, 347.72
11 I do not know the condition of goods as they are containers. All the containers are under the custody of PIL HQ Singapore.
12 Buyer refused to take the goods due to delay, dislocation of containers and creditworthiness of business.
13. Email : from Buyer: From: Christine Baig
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2020 1:25 PM
To: KG SB
Subject: Losses
Krishan Gupta,
I have lost my wholesale and retail buyers and customers due to the delay of containers.
My commitment and reputation to deliver the goods has been ruined due to the delay of delivery of containers in Mombasa.
Could you please explain to me the reason for changing the location of delivery of containers from Mombasa to Nairobi without my authorization.Shipping line never asked me nor have cared to inform me.Our understanding was that the destination on B/L is Mombasa.Any kind of amendment in the contract will be in written form with prior approval from me.This kind of self decision making and altering the contract is called "Breach of Contract" and "breach of trust". This is not an effective and strategic decision.
Damages have occurred due to reckless and criminal behavior by holding freight hostage by Pacific International Lines (PIL).
Compensatory damages : $ 77, 760.00 (April 10, 2020 until August 31, 2020 =144 days
@daily $540.00 =77, 760.00
Punitive damages: $ 2, 000, 000.00 for loss of business reputation and personal injury name
reputation.
Total Expenses:$ 2, 077, 760.00
Please note that there are still ongoing expenses and i am losing money.
PIL HQ have not replied.
You reply is requested
With regards,
Christine
14. 8 Karen Lee from PIL HQ replied: karen.[protected]@sgp.pilship.com
Mon 9/7/2020 5:25 PM
Dear Sir,
We understand our Kenya office have been pro-actively pursuing below case with your consignee.
Thus, pls be informed that we will ceased replying email to you on this issue.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Karen Lee
Asst. Manager • Local / Cross Trade / Inbound Sales Support • Agency & Sales Division
35. Email from K Gupta to Karen Lee dated September 08, 2020:
Kareen Lee,
I am a party/ consigner who owns all three shipping containers along with all the Goods inside the three containers. All three containers are under your custody.
I will not refrain you and I need to know every step you take in this matter.
Thank you,
Regards
Krishan Gupta
36. Email from Mr. K.Gupta to Mr.Ease Teoh (Senior Executive PIL, Singapore)
8 reminder of Claim of damages done by PIL
K G
15 Wed 9/9/2020 10:35 AM
Ease Teoh,
Senior Executive PIL, Singapore
Dear Sir,
Please note the following:
1.Mr. K. Gupta (Consignor) from Los Angeles, exported textiles goods+ home decor +misc. items, 3 x 40 FCL (40 ft. Full container Load)-
2. SOC(Shipper owned Container) to Kenya with your shipping line PIL, HQ in Singapore.
3. Dispute accrued by fabrication of duplicate invoices by the freight forwarder of PIL.
4.PIL USA was holding original B/L .I was told that, I do not need original B/L to get the containers released at the destination port, as everything will be done digitally.
5. On knowledge through Mombasa PIL office that original B/L are being held in PIL USA and they will not release the containers. A complaint was filed by the shipper in BBB (Better Business Bureau) complaint and SFPD(San Francisco Police Department) for blackmailing. PIL USA freight forwarder released the documents within few days to the destination port Mombasa, Kenya.
6.Damages have accrued during the period, PIL Mombasa holding freight hostage.
7. We have asked 7 times to PIL HQ in Singapore to pay the compensatory damages to the
consignee and consignor.
8. This reply from PIL HQ dated 09/07/2020 -5.25 PM from Karen Lee:
Dear Sir,
We understand our Kenya office have been pro-actively pursuing below case with your consignee.
Thus, pls be informed that we will ceased replying email to you on this issue.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Karen Lee
9. My response to Karen Lee PIL H dated 09/08/2020 12:32 AM
K G
Tue 9/8/2020 12:32 AM
To: karen.[protected]@sgp.pilship.com; Christine Gupta+3 others
Kareen Lee,
I am a party/ consigner who owns all three shipping containers along with all the Goods inside the three containers. All three containers are under your custody.
I will not refrain you and I need to know every step you take in this matter.
Thank you,
Regards
Krishan Gupta
16.On Karen lee 's email dated 09/07/2020, I contacted the consignee/buyer.
Here below is correspondence's Consignor asked :I need to know if you have any emails or calls from shipping lines office in Kenya. Head office in Singapore are telling me that they are dealing with you directly. In case you get any calls from Kenyan shipping office ask them to correspond with you via email only. Forward that email me. Thanks.
reply from the consignee: [20:18, 9/8/2020] Christine: No I haven’t received any e mail or phone call from the shipping line from Kenya or Singapore! Tell them to forward you any correspondents for proof[20:20, 9/8/2020] Christine: I just cannot stand Lies!
17. PIL has intentionally false representation made with the intent to mislead
consignee and consignor. PIL is again committing injury without force.
18. Please let me if want some information.
Regards and Thanks
Krishan Gupta
PIl Mombasa DocReports ([protected]@mba.pilship.com) dated October 28, 2020 4:22 Am
Ref: QSM[protected] Others CRM:0673901
[protected]@mlaw.gov.sg ( [protected]@OneMinlaw)
Reply from Singapore Minsitry of Law : Dear Mr Krishnan Gupta
We refer to your enquiry dated 29 October 2020.
In order for us to assist you further, we would appreciate if you could provide us the following information:
1. Your full name and NRIC number, or of the person concerned
2. Ministry of Law's case reference number/division
3. Details of your enquiry.
Thank you.
Best Regards
Muhammad Azli Zulkifli
Dear Muhammad Azli Zulkifli
Dec 27, 2020
Updated by Krishan101 FAQFAQ
Show search
Show menu
ADVERTISEMENT
Law & Civil Rights
Pacific International Lines
Pacific International Lines — Damages
Krishan101 on Dec 27, 2020Mark as Resolved
I am a victim of fraud and professional negligence crime of a Singaporean Government owned company. PIL has internal serial strategic theft stealing commercial assets by confiscating and dislocating my goods. Company refrain me from the information of my property. PIL have knowingly and intentionally created a crime of creating a false document, altering a document, for the illegal benefit of PIL's self-making the forgery.
Letter of Demand to PIL HQ
This letter serves as a formal and final request for repayment of $ 4, 132, 347.72, the unpaid balance that is owed for damages to my properties. These damages caused by you by a fraudulent confiscating my property assessing compensation is linked to the breach of fiduciary duties and duty of loyalty. Your cause of actions is deceit, breach of trust, Breach of contract, conversion and restitution.
This commercial trust is important in assessing damages for breach of which were caused by your actions while holding freight hostage of my Goods with three shipping containers.
Forged duplicate invoices were fabricated with the intention of stealing the cargo. Many times, Freight Forwarder of PIL issues / re-issues Bills of Lading with cargo miss-descriptions and deliberate over statement as to quantity laden, and a knowing miss-description of the cargo laden and therefore seek redress.
The costs of being a victim includes :
Direct Financial loss, reputation loss, loss of business opportunities, investment of time and resources to deal with a litigation, loss of life savings retirements.
Herewith is an estimate illustrate and consist of:
1. Nature of the commodity : Textile, readymade garments, home decor, furniture and misc.
2. Amount of goods and damages: Krishan Gupta consignor/seller :expenses to Export
3. Sea Worthy certificate 3 x $ 100 $ 300.00
4. Cost of one container $2500.00 X3 $ 7500.00
5. Cost of delivery one container from LA $ 1500.00 X 3 $ 4500.00
6. Labor loading costs of one container $ 2000.00 X 3 $ 6000.00
6. Goods in all three containers $ 33, 787.72
7. Documentation and other office expenses $ 2500.00
8. Putting Krishan Gupta out of business & life longs savings for retirement
$ 2, 000, 000.00
Total : $ 2, 054, 587.72
9. Amount of goods and damages : Cristine Baig : Consignee/Buyer :
Total : $ 2, 077, 760.00
10. Total losses : Total : $ 4, 132, 347.72
11. I do not know the condition of goods as they are containers.
All the containers are under the custody of PIL HQ Singapore.
12. Buyer refused to take the goods due to delay, dislocation of containers and
defamation of creditworthiness of business.
Several attempts to resolve this matter with you. You have ignored to response. Your staff Ms. Kareen Lee refrain to respond to me . All my goods and containers are under your custody, I am still the owner and the title holder of the goods with three shipping containers(SOC).
None of these contacts was reciprocated.
If this balance is not received in full by November 6, 2020, I will commence a legal action against you in Singapore Court of Justice.
Sincerely,
Krishan Gupta
E-mail : [protected]@msn.com
Briefing & facts on meritorious : Criminal Breach of trust
Singapore police Force FIR # CRM: 0137534 reply dated : October 06/2020 : 6.37 PM
Dear Mr. Wee Hian Huat Jackson
Manager Feedback Unit
Service Delivery Department
Singapore Police Force
Reference CRM # 0137534
Thank you so much for your reply and registering my case under your GRM # 0137534. Currently I am India living under the laws of Indian government in lockdown Covid-19.
Please note that this case requires your immediate aid and exigent action under these following circumstances:
1. Acts of Pacific International Lines, Singapore are "Egregious and outrageous abuse" with "breach of trust". Title of goods with all three shipping containers belongs to me.
Pacific International Lines's oppressive conduct is cruelty and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of my rights with gross negligence because the conduct complained of is so aggravated in a criminal character with serial evil evidences intent, wantonness, recklessness and malice.
Furthermore, I can point to evidences of malice where punitive damages must be awarded for tortious inference with prospective contracts putting "Krishan Gupta" out of business. A trade secret theft case can find malice from PIL Singapore efforts to keep their secret and defamatory statements have been made by PIL, Singapore and has failed to consult consignor on the consequences of inducing it's breach. Burden of proving the existence of an intentional evil-minded act can found in the trails of email correspondences.
2. Billing of lading : indicates that :Bill of Lading shall be construed as contractually applying " Hague Rules" and unless and until in the Bill of lading expressly amended by the protocol.
Para 31 of Bill of Lading indicates : Law and Jurisdiction
2 (a) : The contract evidenced hereby or contained herein shall be governed by Singapore
law.
(i) law governing the substantive contract (applicable law) is Singapore Government.
(ii) law governing the agreement to arbitrate, and the performance of that agreement (juridical seat or lex arbitri); is Singapore Government and
(iii) law governing the procedure of the arbitration (curial law) is Singapore Government.
3: Nothing herein shall prevent the parties to any claim and/or dispute under this Bill of Lading from agreeing to submit the claim and/or dispute to Singapore arbitration pursuant to the rules of the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (“SCMA”)
In case you need more clarification to proceed further in this case, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Krishan Gupta
From: K Gupta
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 12:59 PM
To: [protected]@police.gov.sg ; [protected]@spf.gov ; [protected]@spf.gov.sg ; [protected]@spf.gov.sg ; hoc.nairobi ; [protected]@ftgs.us
Cc: [protected]@court.go.ke ; [protected]@court.go.ke ; [protected]@kpa.co.ke
Subject: Complaint against Singaporean Government owned Company
Dear Sir,
I am a victim of fraud and professional negligence crime of a Singaporean Government owned company. PIL has internal serial strategic theft stealing commercial assets by confiscating and dislocating my goods. Company refrain me from the information of my property. PIL have knowingly and intentionally created a crime of creating a false document, altering a document, for the illegal benefit of PIL's self-making the forgery.
Briefing and facts:
Three Shipping containers owned by the consignor were shipped from Los Angeles to Mombasa, Kenya thru PIL ( pacific shipping lines).
Papers were approved and stamped by Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce
Dispute occurred by fabrication of duplicate invoices by the freight forwarder of PIL.
The original freight invoices were pre-paid in advance.
I was told that i do not need original B/L at the port of destination, as it will be done online digitally.
On knowledge through Mombasa PIL office Kenya, that original B/L are being held in PIL USA and they will not release the containers.
I filed a complaint in BBB (Better Business Bureau) and SFPD(San Francisco Police Department) for blackmailing.
PIL USA released the documents within few days to the destination port Mombasa, Kenya.
PIL HQ is refraining to reply regarding damages occurred during the period of cargo transection dispute.
PIL HQ is obligated to deliver all three containers with goods in good condition to the consignee.Consignor Mr.K.Gupta is title of ownership of container with goods up till date.
Consignee is not taking the consignment due to delay and Change of location without authorization.Consignee dis-location of containers is unacceptable. Asking for damages.
Your reply to this case is highly appreciated.
Thank you,
Krishan Gupta
1 Nature of the commodity : Textile, readymade garments, home decor, furniture and misc.
2. Amount of goods and damages: Krishan Gupta consignor/seller :expenses to Export
3. Sea Worthy certificate 3 x $ 100 $ 300.00
4. Cost of one container $2500.00 X3 $ 7500.00
5 Cost of delivery one container from LA $ 1500.00 X 3 $ 4500.00
6. Labor loading costs of one container $ 2000.00 X 3 $ 6000.00
7. Goods in all three containers $ 33, 787.72
8. Documentation and other office expenses $ 2500.00
9 Putting Krishan Gupta out of business & life longs savings for retirement $ 2, 000, 000.00
Total : $ 2, 054, 587.72
10 Amount of goods and damages : Cristine Baig : Consignee/Buyer : Total : $ 2, 077, 760.00
Total losses : Total : $ 4, 132, 347.72
11 I do not know the condition of goods as they are containers. All the containers are under the custody of PIL HQ Singapore.
12 Buyer refused to take the goods due to delay, dislocation of containers and creditworthiness of business.
13. Email : from Buyer: From: Christine Baig
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2020 1:25 PM
To: KG SB
Subject: Losses
Krishan Gupta,
I have lost my wholesale and retail buyers and customers due to the delay of containers.
My commitment and reputation to deliver the goods has been ruined due to the delay of delivery of containers in Mombasa.
Could you please explain to me the reason for changing the location of delivery of containers from Mombasa to Nairobi without my authorization.Shipping line never asked me nor have cared to inform me.Our understanding was that the destination on B/L is Mombasa.Any kind of amendment in the contract will be in written form with prior approval from me.This kind of self decision making and altering the contract is called "Breach of Contract" and "breach of trust". This is not an effective and strategic decision.
Damages have occurred due to reckless and criminal behavior by holding freight hostage by Pacific International Lines (PIL).
Compensatory damages : $ 77, 760.00 (April 10, 2020 until August 31, 2020 =144 days
@daily $540.00 =77, 760.00
Punitive damages: $ 2, 000, 000.00 for loss of business reputation and personal injury name
reputation.
Total Expenses:$ 2, 077, 760.00
Please note that there are still ongoing expenses and i am losing money.
PIL HQ have not replied.
You reply is requested
With regards,
Christine
14. 8 Karen Lee from PIL HQ replied: karen.[protected]@sgp.pilship.com
Mon 9/7/2020 5:25 PM
Dear Sir,
We understand our Kenya office have been pro-actively pursuing below case with your consignee.
Thus, pls be informed that we will ceased replying email to you on this issue.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Karen Lee
Asst. Manager • Local / Cross Trade / Inbound Sales Support • Agency & Sales Division
35. Email from K Gupta to Karen Lee dated September 08, 2020:
Kareen Lee,
I am a party/ consigner who owns all three shipping containers along with all the Goods inside the three containers. All three containers are under your custody.
I will not refrain you and I need to know every step you take in this matter.
Thank you,
Regards
Krishan Gupta
36. Email from Mr. K.Gupta to Mr.Ease Teoh (Senior Executive PIL, Singapore)
8 reminder of Claim of damages done by PIL
K G
15 Wed 9/9/2020 10:35 AM
Ease Teoh,
Senior Executive PIL, Singapore
Dear Sir,
Please note the following:
1.Mr. K. Gupta (Consignor) from Los Angeles, exported textiles goods+ home decor +misc. items, 3 x 40 FCL (40 ft. Full container Load)-
2. SOC(Shipper owned Container) to Kenya with your shipping line PIL, HQ in Singapore.
3. Dispute accrued by fabrication of duplicate invoices by the freight forwarder of PIL.
4.PIL USA was holding original B/L .I was told that, I do not need original B/L to get the containers released at the destination port, as everything will be done digitally.
5. On knowledge through Mombasa PIL office that original B/L are being held in PIL USA and they will not release the containers. A complaint was filed by the shipper in BBB (Better Business Bureau) complaint and SFPD(San Francisco Police Department) for blackmailing. PIL USA freight forwarder released the documents within few days to the destination port Mombasa, Kenya.
6.Damages have accrued during the period, PIL Mombasa holding freight hostage.
7. We have asked 7 times to PIL HQ in Singapore to pay the compensatory damages to the
consignee and consignor.
8. This reply from PIL HQ dated 09/07/2020 -5.25 PM from Karen Lee:
Dear Sir,
We understand our Kenya office have been pro-actively pursuing below case with your consignee.
Thus, pls be informed that we will ceased replying email to you on this issue.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Karen Lee
9. My response to Karen Lee PIL H dated 09/08/2020 12:32 AM
K G
Tue 9/8/2020 12:32 AM
To: karen.[protected]@sgp.pilship.com; Christine Gupta+3 others
Kareen Lee,
I am a party/ consigner who owns all three shipping containers along with all the Goods inside the three containers. All three containers are under your custody.
I will not refrain you and I need to know every step you take in this matter.
Thank you,
Regards
Krishan Gupta
16.On Karen lee 's email dated 09/07/2020, I contacted the consignee/buyer.
Here below is correspondence's Consignor asked :I need to know if you have any emails or calls from shipping lines office in Kenya. Head office in Singapore are telling me that they are dealing with you directly. In case you get any calls from Kenyan shipping office ask them to correspond with you via email only. Forward that email me. Thanks.
reply from the consignee: [20:18, 9/8/2020] Christine: No I haven’t received any e mail or phone call from the shipping line from Kenya or Singapore! Tell them to forward you any correspondents for proof[20:20, 9/8/2020] Christine: I just cannot stand Lies!
17. PIL has intentionally false representation made with the intent to mislead
consignee and consignor. PIL is again committing injury without force.
18. Please let me if want some information.
Regards and Thanks
Krishan Gupta
PIl Mombasa DocReports ([protected]@mba.pilship.com) dated October 28, 2020 4:22 Am
Ref: QSM[protected] Others CRM:0673901
[protected]@mlaw.gov.sg ( [protected]@OneMinlaw)
Reply from Singapore Minsitry of Law : Dear Mr Krishnan Gupta
We refer to your enquiry dated 29 October 2020.
In order for us to assist you further, we would appreciate if you could provide us the following information:
1. Your full name and NRIC number, or of the person concerned
2. Ministry of Law's case reference number/division
3. Details of your enquiry.
Thank you.
Best Regards
Muhammad Azli Zulkifli
Dear Muhammad Azli Zulkifli
Post your Comment