Dainik Bhaskar jaipur Complaints & Reviews
Unfair castist support to rajputs by Dainik Bhaskar in rajasthan.
Sir,
In today's Dainik Bhaskar on front page one padm Singh of railways who himself was guilty of Corrupt conduct has complained to vigilance for a deal with a victim passenger of rs 15000.
Mr padm Singh(who seems to be from rajput community) whose surname has been hidden by your reporter and editor, probably has contacts in vigilance...
Sir,
In today's Dainik Bhaskar on front page one padm Singh of railways who himself was guilty of Corrupt conduct has complained to vigilance for a deal with a victim passenger of rs 15000.
Mr padm Singh(who seems to be from rajput community) whose surname has been hidden by your reporter and editor, probably has contacts in vigilance...
Helpful
Be the first one to find this review helpful
Found this helpful?
Address: | Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017 |
Today again your reporter reported wrongly the information of polluted water in Hasanpura Jaipur in the news paper.Fact is that water supplied was good in all respect.
Today in the supply time in the evening your reporter was there and he is provoking the public & forcing them to say that water is not good, even after getting good supply of water
I think he is using your reputed news paper for his personal gains and needs...
Today in the supply time in the evening your reporter was there and he is provoking the public & forcing them to say that water is not good, even after getting good supply of water
I think he is using your reputed news paper for his personal gains and needs...
Helpful
Be the first one to find this review helpful
Found this helpful?
Address: | Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017 |
Pl check the news regarding polluted water in Hasanpura Jaipur.Your reporter is writing on 14.02.16, 15.02.16and 16.02.16 that polluted water is coming from four days .how it is possible that on each day he counts 4 days.
It seems that report is baseless and fraud to damage the image of public serving people and institutions.
Your reporter is working unetheically against your esteemed image of your group...
It seems that report is baseless and fraud to damage the image of public serving people and institutions.
Your reporter is working unetheically against your esteemed image of your group...
Helpful
Be the first one to find this review helpful
Found this helpful?