6 Reviews
  narendra gangan on May 27, 2011
dear sir / madam
Regarding my claim.I was been hospitalized from 15/03/2011 to 19/03/2011 at parel hospital at (parel bhoiwada) I was been affected by Pulmonary kochs. i have submitted documents whatever they needed i have pd the cash to hospital but when i have putted the documents for claim they are saying claim non payable under clause 2.3(c) at the time of admitted i was very weak & i couldnt speak to any one it was very bad condition for that reason i was admitted & it was my goodluck that by taking medicine & saline there was improvement in my health. Is it fair after paying cash to hospital they are saying it is non payable & i am not too high salary guy at the time of paying bill to hspital i have borrowed money from someone else because i was confirmed that i will get my money back and after that i will pay him back
Insured name Narendra gangan
ID number 05564367DGFCM
Policy num 121200/48/2011/12220
Claim num 556211122849


Narendra gangan
Complaint comments 5 Comments     Updated: Resolve this Complaint  


N May 21, 2013 by
Best Review
cheating Company. Do not invest money on this RAKSHA TPA.
Complainant2032852 Raksha TPA  - India
i have operated on a patient named swadesh mishra id no. ill/utt/522148 for haemorrhoids on 7/2/09 but the claim has not been settled till date after repeated reminders
N Nov 6, 2011 by
Amar Wadhwa  
2.3 is for amount payable for Surgeon etc's fees. There is no clause 2.3 (c).
Please mention correct clause/reason for which the claim has been rejected
N Dec 8, 2012 by
mariyajob Raksha TPA  - India

claim not settled - Raksha TPA

My name is mariya johny. my client ID is UIC5457425SBI in raksha tpa.Even after completing 5 months from my claim date, my maternity claim is not yet settled nor a response from raksha office regarding the status. I am totally frustrated and decided to go legally.
N Oct 27, 2013 by
it is very worst company please even dont turn your head to raksha

Post your Comment

    I want to submit Complaint Positive Review Neutral Comment
    Your Rating (1 star is bad, 5 stars is good) No Rating