| Address: | 431517 | | Website: | Medical education & drugs Maharashtra |
Respected sir,
I am a muslim women from maharashtra dist. Beed, tq. Ambajogai.
I am struggling from last 16 years for a govt. Job in srtr medical college ambajogai. The case was in highcourt of aurangabad and the final judgement came in april 2015 in favour of mine.
I can not express all the detail of court desicision. I tried somany times but they did not respond. Would you please help me. The final judgement is attached in (Add image) folder.
Thanks Was this information helpful? | 
The applicarrt is HSC passecl
ald has a diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology,
which qualifications she had acquired pdor to 13.9.2000.
Herrce the respondent
no. 2 or 3 should have considered
her case for appointment as a Jr. C1erk or Lab Atteodant or
any other posts in Group C on the basis of her
qualifications. 'lhe
Respondents have nowhere clarified as
to on what ba-sis they found the applicant to be not
qua-lified for a post other thar that of a Telephone Operator.
Hence for proper adjudication we feel that directions need
to be issue to the Respondents 2 and 3 to examine afresh
the applicart's eligibility for appointment from ihe
pAp
category. Lleoce the OA. stands disposed of ir} terms of the
fol.lowing
directj.ons.
LO
A) The OA is partly a11owed.
11 o.A. 868
/2005.
B) The Respondents 2 a:rd 3 are directed to consider
afresh the appiicant's caldidature for apiointment to a
Group C posl on the basis of her seniority in the List
(Annexure
"G") and qualilications out of the quota for
pAps.
C) If the applica]]t is found eiigible for such a post, the
above Responderrts will grant her appointment to lhe post.
The applicant hor, veveL will not be entitled to claim seniodty
earlier to the date of her appointment"
D) NCorder as to costs.
MEngtrR(D
AtpoaB6BO5
VICE AIRMAN (A}