Comments
i am going to delhi please u can give me ur affidavite to me, please help each other.i am from lucknow, lucknow walo apna affidabet mujh ko do mai delhi jaa raha hoo, apna affidabet lay kar.amit kanaujia-[protected]
Reply
SIr,
Is it possible to mail the scanned affidivate in the IT age?And not filing fir is it not the supprt to the company ?.I feel if the list of the investers filing fir is avalable then the non fir list will be avalable with company which it self will be support .From pune very big no OF INVESTERS ARE THERE AND THE LIST OF THESE NON FIR PEOPLE MAY BE MADE AVALABLE BY COMPANY IN THE COURT.
SBKULKARNI
[protected]
Is it possible to mail the scanned affidivate in the IT age?And not filing fir is it not the supprt to the company ?.I feel if the list of the investers filing fir is avalable then the non fir list will be avalable with company which it self will be support .From pune very big no OF INVESTERS ARE THERE AND THE LIST OF THESE NON FIR PEOPLE MAY BE MADE AVALABLE BY COMPANY IN THE COURT.
SBKULKARNI
[protected]
Sir,
After my more than 26 of meritourious service in the Indian Paramilitary Force, retired from service and on being briefing the sub agent of keral, I have deposited an amount of 1, 15, 000/- in the co. Later on the executive Manager requested to return the cheque as they have been issued ESC money system.But after that number of correspondance were made but no response is received. If any body received any information about their payament please inform me also . Thaning you
After my more than 26 of meritourious service in the Indian Paramilitary Force, retired from service and on being briefing the sub agent of keral, I have deposited an amount of 1, 15, 000/- in the co. Later on the executive Manager requested to return the cheque as they have been issued ESC money system.But after that number of correspondance were made but no response is received. If any body received any information about their payament please inform me also . Thaning you
sir, we are only suport to roopesh on behalf of cos roopessh is agree to pay the money to investor, so we request to court please release to roopesh on timely release some people is only created the problem so we request to roopesh please run the cos and launch the scheme and mark cleary to investor, as per your risk invest the money in cos, we hope more of investor is retirement people, mr. roopesh what ever reson u can start the mony only asper agreement some people is launch the complaint against cos please sole the proble by court and other problem sold by u as on individual basis,
HELLO, i not agree with this statement becos first time company say "ECS" and now affidavite.
Dear All Concerned Investors,
I am a small investor in this company but please get your facts right before raising any of your doubts or questions. Don't just arrive at any conclusion in a hurry to console your comfort. E.C.S. was a process which the company was supposed to take before MD; Mr. Roopesh was arrested in order to replace cheque disbursing process. E.C.S. stands for Electronic Clearing System which a bank provides to its clients in order to transfer any amount from his/her account to all other clients (Customers of the same bank or other banks). The former here stands for Company's Bank Account & the later are accounts of fellow investors like us. Now for any bank to give ECS facility to its client (here SOSN), the merchant has to register the actual name of it's Investors, their Bank Name, Account No, IFSC Code, Branch Name to which the money is to be transferred as mandatory details which I think SOSN has collected from its investors.
Since Mr. Roopesh has been arrested for over a month & all his bank accounts & assets have been seized by Patiala High Court, company is no longer running currently. Only if honorable judge gives verdict in favor of MD, Mr. Roopesh & de-seize all his bank accounts & assets, only then he can run his company. Now how & why the honorable court will give its verdict in favor of Mr. Verma? This is where his lawyer has come out with a plan to submit notary sealed Affidavit from it's investors to the court to show their support. The more the Affidavits are submitted, the more is the chance of him getting the bail! Some one has even commented that in this electronic age what is the necessity of submitting Affidavits? But the matter of fact is our judiciary system doesn't approve any electronic means of proof. Only notary sealed Affidavits are considered authentic means of support/proof.
So, my dear friends there are certain issues which you can solve through different ways but our judiciary system only approves certain processes which may be even time consuming some times. So, support Mr. Verma through Affidavits if you think that is the way to go. I certainly think so.
- Ayan
Investor of SOSN
Mumbai
I am a small investor in this company but please get your facts right before raising any of your doubts or questions. Don't just arrive at any conclusion in a hurry to console your comfort. E.C.S. was a process which the company was supposed to take before MD; Mr. Roopesh was arrested in order to replace cheque disbursing process. E.C.S. stands for Electronic Clearing System which a bank provides to its clients in order to transfer any amount from his/her account to all other clients (Customers of the same bank or other banks). The former here stands for Company's Bank Account & the later are accounts of fellow investors like us. Now for any bank to give ECS facility to its client (here SOSN), the merchant has to register the actual name of it's Investors, their Bank Name, Account No, IFSC Code, Branch Name to which the money is to be transferred as mandatory details which I think SOSN has collected from its investors.
Since Mr. Roopesh has been arrested for over a month & all his bank accounts & assets have been seized by Patiala High Court, company is no longer running currently. Only if honorable judge gives verdict in favor of MD, Mr. Roopesh & de-seize all his bank accounts & assets, only then he can run his company. Now how & why the honorable court will give its verdict in favor of Mr. Verma? This is where his lawyer has come out with a plan to submit notary sealed Affidavit from it's investors to the court to show their support. The more the Affidavits are submitted, the more is the chance of him getting the bail! Some one has even commented that in this electronic age what is the necessity of submitting Affidavits? But the matter of fact is our judiciary system doesn't approve any electronic means of proof. Only notary sealed Affidavits are considered authentic means of support/proof.
So, my dear friends there are certain issues which you can solve through different ways but our judiciary system only approves certain processes which may be even time consuming some times. So, support Mr. Verma through Affidavits if you think that is the way to go. I certainly think so.
- Ayan
Investor of SOSN
Mumbai
AFFIDAVIT
I, Santanu Singha son/ daughter/ wife of Shree J.Singha age 38 years R/O address C/O Mohammed Jaffer H, No 10 1 st main 2nd Cross. RMV 2nd Stage Ashwatnagar Bangalore 560 094do hereby solemnly affirm & declare as under:-
1. That I invested Rs. 1, 59, 000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Nine Thousand) Only in the Car Plan/ Resort Membership Plan in the company of Shree Om Sainath Car On Rent Ltd. located at <102, Prestige Meridian.Block-1, 29, M.G. Road Bangalore 560-094>, vide receipt no.42544 dated 09/09/2009 and entered into an agreement dated 11th Sep 2009 for sixty months.
2. That I have received the agreed amount/ compensation continuously since the date of agreement till November 2009 as per terms & conditions of the agreement.
3. That I am satisfied with the company & want to continue the agreement if the agreed amount is to be made by the company continuously in future till the expiry of the contract.
Deponent
Verification:-
Verified at <Bangalore> on this date10 Feb 2010 that the contents of the above Affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge & nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Notary Seal Attested
Notary Public
Advocate Dharmendra Arya has seeked the help of the investors. Kindly send the above Affidavit to reach the Advocate’s office address by 10th February, 2010 in maximum numbers:-
Mr. Dharmender Arya – Advocate
239, Lawyers Chamber,
Patiala House, New Delhi.
I, Santanu Singha son/ daughter/ wife of Shree J.Singha age 38 years R/O address C/O Mohammed Jaffer H, No 10 1 st main 2nd Cross. RMV 2nd Stage Ashwatnagar Bangalore 560 094do hereby solemnly affirm & declare as under:-
1. That I invested Rs. 1, 59, 000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Nine Thousand) Only in the Car Plan/ Resort Membership Plan in the company of Shree Om Sainath Car On Rent Ltd. located at <102, Prestige Meridian.Block-1, 29, M.G. Road Bangalore 560-094>, vide receipt no.42544 dated 09/09/2009 and entered into an agreement dated 11th Sep 2009 for sixty months.
2. That I have received the agreed amount/ compensation continuously since the date of agreement till November 2009 as per terms & conditions of the agreement.
3. That I am satisfied with the company & want to continue the agreement if the agreed amount is to be made by the company continuously in future till the expiry of the contract.
Deponent
Verification:-
Verified at <Bangalore> on this date10 Feb 2010 that the contents of the above Affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge & nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Notary Seal Attested
Notary Public
Advocate Dharmendra Arya has seeked the help of the investors. Kindly send the above Affidavit to reach the Advocate’s office address by 10th February, 2010 in maximum numbers:-
Mr. Dharmender Arya – Advocate
239, Lawyers Chamber,
Patiala House, New Delhi.
Re: Court hearing details 13th & 15th September 10
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
TO ALL MY INVESTOR FRIEND'S ACROSS INDIDIA,
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO SEEK HIGH COURT STAY.
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 16 September, 2010 10:47:17 PM
Subject: Court hearing details 13th & 15th September 10
We are thankful to Mr. Anil, Mr. Manoj Kumar & others for the update for rest of the investors community. As Justice S P Garg reserved his decision on the bail plea of Mr. Rv finding it difficult unless & until the investors start receiving their payments under a committee he had recommended to over look the earlier basis for rejection of bail by the lower court & suggest to form the committee under Justice R C Chopra.
The court on 13th September decided to extend a passionate hearing to the cause of bail to Mr. Rv & heard the lawyers of both the accused & victim & reciprocated in a positive manner. The lawyers were better behaved & seems to have got into understanding that unless & until the investors start receiving some money bail to Mr. Rv is not possible.
Justice Ajay Pandey was of the view that the court should be apprised where is the money available & how it will be paid. The IO of EOW was unable to confirm how much unfettered amount is available & sought time for the same to be confirmed from the bank & requested for orders by the judge to the bank official to present the same in the court which by Judge order can be released to the investors at the earliest. The order was made for the same.
Mr. Rvs lawyer informed about around Rs.15-18 Cr. Plus various properties like one in Lucknow costing 3 Cr.+ 2 resort/hotel in Gurgaon of value 18 Cr.+ and various properties across India owned by sosn/Rv etc. and Rs.9.5 crores in IOB Mumbai which can be used to repay. The court suggested only the properties & money under their jurisdiction will be used.
There were persons from Pune group representing 1500+ investors & tried to place their list of the same to the court, the court suggested them to approach Mumbai court for the same & said any procedure followed at Delhi court will be a precedent & the order could be presented in courts in other cities for the same kind of relief. And sosn/Mr. Rv has sufficient money & assets for the same.
The court kept other hearing date as 15th September 10.
The court granted interim bail to Mr. Amit Verma against two surities of Rs. 50 lakh each, to arrange for Rs.10 to 40 Cr. Within 25 days, so the money can be given to the investors by the committee under the chairmanship of Justice R C Chopra. If the same cannot be completed in time then any further bail would not be granted to any body & the case will run for normal course.
The court has kept 13th October 10 for the next hearing.
Disclaimer. Sosn Investor Forum is only extending an voluntary service in the interest of investors and irrespective of all efforts been made to provide authentic; true and correct information; cannot guarantee the same nor does it provide any professional; legal; financial advice. It is individuals and readers own prerogative to Interpret & understand at their own level.
From:
Rajendra Nigam <[protected]@yahoo.in>
View Contact
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
TO ALL MY INVESTOR FRIEND'S ACROSS INDIDIA,
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO SEEK HIGH COURT STAY.
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
From: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
To: Investor Forum <[protected]@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 16 September, 2010 10:47:17 PM
Subject: Court hearing details 13th & 15th September 10
We are thankful to Mr. Anil, Mr. Manoj Kumar & others for the update for rest of the investors community. As Justice S P Garg reserved his decision on the bail plea of Mr. Rv finding it difficult unless & until the investors start receiving their payments under a committee he had recommended to over look the earlier basis for rejection of bail by the lower court & suggest to form the committee under Justice R C Chopra.
The court on 13th September decided to extend a passionate hearing to the cause of bail to Mr. Rv & heard the lawyers of both the accused & victim & reciprocated in a positive manner. The lawyers were better behaved & seems to have got into understanding that unless & until the investors start receiving some money bail to Mr. Rv is not possible.
Justice Ajay Pandey was of the view that the court should be apprised where is the money available & how it will be paid. The IO of EOW was unable to confirm how much unfettered amount is available & sought time for the same to be confirmed from the bank & requested for orders by the judge to the bank official to present the same in the court which by Judge order can be released to the investors at the earliest. The order was made for the same.
Mr. Rvs lawyer informed about around Rs.15-18 Cr. Plus various properties like one in Lucknow costing 3 Cr.+ 2 resort/hotel in Gurgaon of value 18 Cr.+ and various properties across India owned by sosn/Rv etc. and Rs.9.5 crores in IOB Mumbai which can be used to repay. The court suggested only the properties & money under their jurisdiction will be used.
There were persons from Pune group representing 1500+ investors & tried to place their list of the same to the court, the court suggested them to approach Mumbai court for the same & said any procedure followed at Delhi court will be a precedent & the order could be presented in courts in other cities for the same kind of relief. And sosn/Mr. Rv has sufficient money & assets for the same.
The court kept other hearing date as 15th September 10.
The court granted interim bail to Mr. Amit Verma against two surities of Rs. 50 lakh each, to arrange for Rs.10 to 40 Cr. Within 25 days, so the money can be given to the investors by the committee under the chairmanship of Justice R C Chopra. If the same cannot be completed in time then any further bail would not be granted to any body & the case will run for normal course.
The court has kept 13th October 10 for the next hearing.
Disclaimer. Sosn Investor Forum is only extending an voluntary service in the interest of investors and irrespective of all efforts been made to provide authentic; true and correct information; cannot guarantee the same nor does it provide any professional; legal; financial advice. It is individuals and readers own prerogative to Interpret & understand at their own level.
TO ALL MY INVESTOR FRIEND'S ACROSS INDIDIA,
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO FIND JUSTICE THROUGH SUPREME COURT VIA HIGH COURT.
LATEST INFORMATION OF COURT HEARING ON 7th JAN 2011
The Hon'ble Magistrate Mr. Amit Bansal Additional City Matropolian Magistrate Patiyala House Court at Newe Delhi has cancelled the bail of Mr. Amit Verma ( Chairman of SOSN) as he could not deposite the
amount which was 10 to 40 cores as ordered by Hon, ble Session Judge Mr. S.P.Garg. In my view it was good because if he had deposited the amount than this money is to be distributed amongst Delhi Investor Only & other investor across India remain kept on waiting waiting & waithing. So my dear friend, s dont waste the time and join hands to fight case in Supreme Court because the verdict given by Hon, ble Supreme court will be a binding on every court if India. Now its upto you?
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO FIND JUSTICE THROUGH SUPREME COURT VIA HIGH COURT.
LATEST INFORMATION OF COURT HEARING ON 7th JAN 2011
The Hon'ble Magistrate Mr. Amit Bansal Additional City Matropolian Magistrate Patiyala House Court at Newe Delhi has cancelled the bail of Mr. Amit Verma ( Chairman of SOSN) as he could not deposite the
amount which was 10 to 40 cores as ordered by Hon, ble Session Judge Mr. S.P.Garg. In my view it was good because if he had deposited the amount than this money is to be distributed amongst Delhi Investor Only & other investor across India remain kept on waiting waiting & waithing. So my dear friend, s dont waste the time and join hands to fight case in Supreme Court because the verdict given by Hon, ble Supreme court will be a binding on every court if India. Now its upto you?
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
please told me the next hiring date of sons roopes in patiala house in delhi.
Next hiring date roopush verma in delhi patiala house SONS