Comments
Respected sir,
I am Dinkar Modi, i have applied the IPO of Omnitech Infosolutions Limited, (Reistry company: Intime Spectrum registry limited)but not alloted the shares.I have till date not received the refund order. I am complain my broker(Karvy Stock Broking limitd) but not any reply for me. I am other complain in sebi.(ACK.REF.NO.2008/0008765/01 DATED 12/02/2008) but till date not any reply. So pl give my refund order.the following detail of IPO Application.
IPO Company Name: Omnitech Infosolutions Limited
Application NO. 1607739
Applicant Name : Dinkar R Modi
Cheque NO. 0000022
Cheque of Bank : Kotak Mahindra Bank
Dated : 24/07/2007
Amount : 6300/-
Applied Shares : 60
Alloted shares : zero
Deamat A/c No.14791169
DP Name : Karvy Stock Broking Ltd.,
Bank A/c no.[protected]
Bank Name : Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.,
sir ji muje jal se jal refund order mile iske liye muje kya karna padega krupya karke muje batye. mera mobile no.[protected].agar aur kuch bhi jankari chahi ye to muje phone kari ya e-mail kar di ji ye.
thank you,
Dinkar Modi
I am Dinkar Modi, i have applied the IPO of Omnitech Infosolutions Limited, (Reistry company: Intime Spectrum registry limited)but not alloted the shares.I have till date not received the refund order. I am complain my broker(Karvy Stock Broking limitd) but not any reply for me. I am other complain in sebi.(ACK.REF.NO.2008/0008765/01 DATED 12/02/2008) but till date not any reply. So pl give my refund order.the following detail of IPO Application.
IPO Company Name: Omnitech Infosolutions Limited
Application NO. 1607739
Applicant Name : Dinkar R Modi
Cheque NO. 0000022
Cheque of Bank : Kotak Mahindra Bank
Dated : 24/07/2007
Amount : 6300/-
Applied Shares : 60
Alloted shares : zero
Deamat A/c No.14791169
DP Name : Karvy Stock Broking Ltd.,
Bank A/c no.[protected]
Bank Name : Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.,
sir ji muje jal se jal refund order mile iske liye muje kya karna padega krupya karke muje batye. mera mobile no.[protected].agar aur kuch bhi jankari chahi ye to muje phone kari ya e-mail kar di ji ye.
thank you,
Dinkar Modi
sir, i shiv shankar had purchased a100 shares of reliance petrochemicals in the year 1992, from some " m/s growmore research and asset management ltd".i paid the whole amount, when i it sent for transfer in my name, it was returned back to me as marked"" custodian a/c"".i do not know what does it mean and what is my fault in it.and who is resposible for it. i kept the share certificate duly sighed by the first party, and lost them in thr meantime.recently i am going through a severe financial crisis and by god grace i founded my share back. i approached karvy computers, hydrebad, they studied my case and suggested me to approach special court, i have lack of money, so that is why i cannot hire a lawyer to solve my case in bombay, and even to stay in bombay, i have seen your programe a no. of times and belived that investor helpline could do something for me.please get my shares back to me, i am not very much educated to duly do all formalities .you are my last hope, so i request you to look into this matter personally, (Masterfolio no.[protected], (Certificate no.[protected] . (Distintive no.[protected][protected] as on 22nd day of january 1992. Please tell how to proceed and what more you wanted to know from me, and how to send the photostat of share certificate and application sent to karvy, hydrebad, waiting for your response,
sir my deemat [protected] mrs geeta sharma not open my id hw can see my holding in my deemat my contact no [protected] email [protected]@gmail.com
To Date.30.04.2011
Arbitration Department
National Stock Exchange of India Limited.
Delhi.
Sub: Arbitration Matter No.D-166/2009
Between
Azhar Abbas (applicant)
And
Alankit Assignment Ltd. (T.M) Respondent
Ref: your letter dated.15.10.2009
Dear Sir,
In reference to the award given in this case it seems that decision to reject the claim of the applicant has been taken on the basis that it could not be proved that Mr.Alok Kumar Rai was trading with the respondent Alankit Assignment Ltd. as its employee/ registered/ sub-broke/ franchise.
Sir, I request to consider this point that Alok Kumar Rai is a representative of Alankit Assignment Ltd .in the light of following points:
1. From the beginning Applicant was complaining about Mr. Alok Kumar Rai. If Alankit Assignment Ltd. has no relation with Alok Kumar Rai, why did they not point out the same in the every beginning actually in every reply Alankit assignment Ltd. has defended its representative Mr.Alok Kumar Rai.
2. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Says at time of hearing “Who is Alok Kumar Rai” and the “Alok Kumar Rai is our client.”
3. Sir applicant is an unemployed young man and not a lawyer. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Diverted the topic to confuse the Applicant and you can not assume applicant to be ready with evidence on a topic raised at the time of hearing. Why have they not raised this point before i.e. in their previous replies In this situation applicant should have provided some time to produce evidence
4. Even then on coming back to Varanasi Applicant sent a letter with evidences (letter datd.24.9.2009 received at Arbitration Department on 1.10.2009) copy of the letter (Encl. 1) is attached for your reference. But I do not find any reference to that letter in the award. So I request you to go though the letter dated 24.9.2009.
5. The “Employee/Authorized person” Mr. Vimlendu Shekhar mentioned at page no.4 of agreement (Encl. 2) is son of Mr. Alok Kumar Rai. This can be verified from his records at Alankit Assignment Ltd. This shows the relationship of Mr.Alok Kumar Rai and his family with Alankit Assignment Ltd.
6. Client Branch and Client Group- BAN9 Alok Kumar Rai has been assigned to Mr. Alok Kumar Rai by Alankit Assignment Ltd. Itself, which can be seen on Statement of Securities Transaction Tax for equity (Encl. 3)
7. Mr. Alok Kumar Rai runs his share trading terminal with signboard of Alankit Assignment Ltd., which can be seen in the attached photograph (Encl. 4)
8. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Should be asked to provide detail about the person who requested to open the limit on 07.01.2009
Now, it is clear that Alankit Assignment Ltd. Has relationship with Mr. Alok Kumar Rai and is responsible for making loss to the applicant.
Alankit Assignment Ltd. has done serious crime of hiding the truth in the court, for which the should be heavily punished.
Thanking you,
You’re sincerely,
(Azhar Abbas)
S-7/166-A Golghar
Kachahari Varanasi (UP)
Mob, [protected]
Arbitration Department
National Stock Exchange of India Limited.
Delhi.
Sub: Arbitration Matter No.D-166/2009
Between
Azhar Abbas (applicant)
And
Alankit Assignment Ltd. (T.M) Respondent
Ref: your letter dated.15.10.2009
Dear Sir,
In reference to the award given in this case it seems that decision to reject the claim of the applicant has been taken on the basis that it could not be proved that Mr.Alok Kumar Rai was trading with the respondent Alankit Assignment Ltd. as its employee/ registered/ sub-broke/ franchise.
Sir, I request to consider this point that Alok Kumar Rai is a representative of Alankit Assignment Ltd .in the light of following points:
1. From the beginning Applicant was complaining about Mr. Alok Kumar Rai. If Alankit Assignment Ltd. has no relation with Alok Kumar Rai, why did they not point out the same in the every beginning actually in every reply Alankit assignment Ltd. has defended its representative Mr.Alok Kumar Rai.
2. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Says at time of hearing “Who is Alok Kumar Rai” and the “Alok Kumar Rai is our client.”
3. Sir applicant is an unemployed young man and not a lawyer. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Diverted the topic to confuse the Applicant and you can not assume applicant to be ready with evidence on a topic raised at the time of hearing. Why have they not raised this point before i.e. in their previous replies In this situation applicant should have provided some time to produce evidence
4. Even then on coming back to Varanasi Applicant sent a letter with evidences (letter datd.24.9.2009 received at Arbitration Department on 1.10.2009) copy of the letter (Encl. 1) is attached for your reference. But I do not find any reference to that letter in the award. So I request you to go though the letter dated 24.9.2009.
5. The “Employee/Authorized person” Mr. Vimlendu Shekhar mentioned at page no.4 of agreement (Encl. 2) is son of Mr. Alok Kumar Rai. This can be verified from his records at Alankit Assignment Ltd. This shows the relationship of Mr.Alok Kumar Rai and his family with Alankit Assignment Ltd.
6. Client Branch and Client Group- BAN9 Alok Kumar Rai has been assigned to Mr. Alok Kumar Rai by Alankit Assignment Ltd. Itself, which can be seen on Statement of Securities Transaction Tax for equity (Encl. 3)
7. Mr. Alok Kumar Rai runs his share trading terminal with signboard of Alankit Assignment Ltd., which can be seen in the attached photograph (Encl. 4)
8. Alankit Assignment Ltd. Should be asked to provide detail about the person who requested to open the limit on 07.01.2009
Now, it is clear that Alankit Assignment Ltd. Has relationship with Mr. Alok Kumar Rai and is responsible for making loss to the applicant.
Alankit Assignment Ltd. has done serious crime of hiding the truth in the court, for which the should be heavily punished.
Thanking you,
You’re sincerely,
(Azhar Abbas)
S-7/166-A Golghar
Kachahari Varanasi (UP)
Mob, [protected]
Omnitech InfoSolutions Ltd — Refund of 2007-08
I Have sumitt my itr 4 2007-08 last year but i did't received my refundPan Card No: AHGPR6510D
Name: Rajesh Rawat
Father Name: Late Shri P S Rawat
Address: D-111 Gali No 3
East Vinod Nagar
Delhi 91