Qnet — biodisk

To those #,
This is my questions to all people who involved in qnet and blindly following below mention people who absconded from india and acting as icons are sachin gupta, kavita saugandh, sharfun sheikh, dev wadhwani pathman, and above all fatass dato, ask them that if they are doing business ethically and legally then why lookout circular, arrest warrant issue by hon’ble indian court, appropriate authority and interpol. And carrying out business in legally then they should surrender before indian courts and resolve this issue?
Let me tell you some facts about qnet,
1) in below link see qnet founder vijay eswaran, eswaran has denied any involvement with vihan direct selling, who is feeding money to his packets.
HTTPs://vijayeswaranqnetscam.wordpress.com/category/vijay-eswaran-fraud/
2) when india ceo suresh thimiri denies relations with the company - moneylife
HTTP://googleweblight.com/i?u=HTTP://WWW.moneylife.in/article/qnet-mumbai-police...
3) on below mention you tube channel dato give reply about bad publicity that "let the dogs bark” HTTPs://youtu.be/YZVLGgl6Vtc
I would like to ask him that how dare you to called peoples who lost money and hon’ble courts and appropriate government authorities who are opposing your business model as a dogs. While motivating his agents on your you tube channel you talking about ethics and entrepreneurship is using such a words is the part of your ethics? Calling everybody barking dogs you supposed yourself as a lion? You come to india and resolve that reports and cases are going in hon’ble court which i mention below with link as source and deny any connection with vihaan direct selling company which is giving you money earned by this business, is it truthfulness or ethical?
HTTPs://youtu.be/vKviklhvGOc
HTTP://WWW.moneylife.in/article/qnet-mumbai-police-issue-lookout-notice-against-...
HTTPs://WWW.quora.com/Which-is-the-most-cheated-and-unethical-team-in-Qnet?_e_pi...
HTTPs://WWW.quora.com/What-are-all-complaints-and-scams-regarding-QNET?_e_pi_=7%...
HTTP://WWW.moneylife.in/article/qnet-mumbai-police-issue-lookout-notice-against-...
4) writ petition no.19402 of 2013 (T-tar) filed before hon’ble karnataka high court by customs department transview enterprises import chi pendent as artificial jewellery and sold at 50000 inr. Hon’ble judge passed order to detained that goods because importers given false information about products which are meant for qnet and made in germany.
5) letter hon'ble bombay high court in bail plea no. 360 give opportunities to defend themselves and send biodisk to bhabha atomic research institute for confirming the claims about biodisk properties and concluded that it is only piece of plastic, then found business model as completely scam.
6) when the whole qnet scam exposed then qnet found no way out, to protect themselves against strict legal action qnet accept the all charges that biodisk actually have cost of only 110 inr. Also accepted that all wrongdoing made to evade tax duetys, and for to fooling peoples by doing scam see HTTPs://WWW.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=HTTP://WWW.mo...
After reading my comment on face book mr. Sachin gupta marked my comment as spam by blocking my comment can you change the truth, or may i conclude that the rolls royce that mr. Sachin gupta posing on face book purchased by looting gullible victims, his foreign trip done by looted moneys"
HTTPs://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_Eswaran
Watch your contract with company there's stated that if something goes wrong only ir will be responsible for it not company, and company lawyer argued that major complaints are against irs not company, if something goes wrong you will be on your own, please don't think that sachin gupta, kavita saugandh, sharfun shaikh, dev wadhwani enjoying money earned by their hardwork they settled abroad to hide, saving themselves to getting arrested and above all to evade taxes which is the right of indian government, in v-con video their is nowhere name of company because this business is banned in saudi arabia, and your up line direct the new irs by get apply for tourists visa not business visa if you tell to authority you are there for business engage with company you will caught by dubai authority known for strict rules and laws and imprisonment
Above all how shameless you are? Yourself declared god addressing your fellow countrymen as dogs and despite of that you work with him only for 10 % of commission and laundering to abroad for hiding and enjoying lavish lifestyle.
Qnet, the controversial hong kong-based multi-level marketing (Mlm) company, has been trying hard to get support from its peers, but with no success. While a few powerful members are not allowing qnet’s entry into the indian direct selling association (Idsa), its franchisee vihaan direct selling (India) pvt ltd’s application too has been rejected by the other association, federation of direct selling association (Fdsa)
Fdsa has rejected membership application of vihaan direct selling (India) pvt ltd. Michael ferreira, former world billiards champion, owns 80% stake in vihaan, while the rest is owned by malcolm desai. Both ferreira and desai, along with vihaan's directors, magaral balaji and srinivas vanka, were arrested by police in october in the multi-crore qnet scam.
While rejecting vihaan's membership application, fdsa said, "the federation is repeatedly being approached by economic offences wing (Eow) of mumbai police seeking various information regarding the company (Vihaan). The (Scrutiny) committee feels it has collected the information about the pending court cases and is serious on the sub-judice status of the company. The committee feels that the sub-judice status of the company (Vihaan) will jeopardise the faith of the government/ industry bodies in the federation, hence recommends that the company need to come out clean before being considered by the federation."
Srinivas vanka (V srinivas rao), the operations head of vihaan, has been trying hard to get membership of fdsa. He met and tried to convince fdsa officials several times.in the letter, the fdsa says, "... During the personal meeting at hyderabad, we have received your logics (Sic) and justification on your defence over what is happening in the field. You may be right at your end, but what image you carry is more important, which is created by the activities seen at ground level."
The fdsa, in the letter dated 17 april 2016 also says vihaan is in the recruitment business rather than retailing, allowing an independent representative (Ir) to open as many as 21 business centres under one id. The letter says, "... The company revenue proportion of id activation sales and retailing sales, clearly indicates that new recruitments is the only business in focus, not retailing."
Fdsa says that according to its code of conduct, products from members should be reasonably priced, have optimum utility and be re-saleable. "your (Vihaan's) core product, the holiday voucher is one such product, which is not falling in line with our fdsa norms. The magnetic pendent is another product falling in grey area, which has notional value
The rejection letter from fdsa also raises questions on refund and indiscipline in vihaan, citing complaints it received from people who claim they have been dragged into qnet. Fdsa says, "at ground level, it is a common practice that the irs put soft pressure on a prospect for depositing couple of lakh rupees in the company. If the prospect is not having the funds, a personal loan is processed in no time under some arrangement with the branch manager of the bank. This is a case of lawlessness amongst the irs and poor control of the company on them. You cannot do away this fact by classifying this as an act o[censored]nsatisfied people. The committee considers this as no less than disguised money circulation and gross indiscipline in the industry."
Fdsa also reveals how its director v srinivas rao also misled the courts of law across the country. He had repeatedly stated in his submissions before the courts that he had resigned as director from vihaan in august-september 2014 and thus had no links to the qnet franchisee thereafter. However, the application submitted to fdsa is dated 16 december 2015 and mentions v srinivas rao as head of operations of vihaan.
#financialterrorism #qnet #moneychain #qnetscam #directselling #qnetscamkerala
#qnetindia #youth #scam #hyderabad #kerala #ernakulam #fraud #moneylaundering #colleges
Was this information helpful?
No (0)
Yes (0)
QNET customer support has been notified about the posted complaint.
Complaint comments 

Post your Comment

    I want to submit Complaint Positive Review Neutral Comment
    code
    By clicking Submit you agree to our Terms of Use
    Submit
    QNET
    customer care contact
    Customer satisfaction rating Customer satisfaction rating is a complex algorithm that helps our users determine how good a company is at responding and resolving complaints by granting from 1 to 5 stars for each complaint and then ultimately combining them all for an overall score.
    Read more
    22%
    Complaints
    1240
    Pending
    0
    Resolved
    268
    QNET Phone
    +91 99 0006 0064
    +91 22 3246 6785
    +91 99 0006 0061
    QNET Address
    Shop No 5 Plot No 161 SAI Krupa Bldg Sainath Seva Chs, Scheme No 57, Wadala, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400031
    View all QNET contact information