[Resolved] Sen Immigration — Sumit Sen Fraud | |
finally all the allegations has come true,(Sen Immigration Dubai IS CLOSED and they ran away from UAE ALSO LIKE INDIA AND MANY OTHER COUNTRIES.. i am ALOS a victim of arrange employment and paid £3000 for that, nearly 18th months and nothing happens, i requested the money back by Dubai office, a branch manager name AIMNA so i was told by her that' your money will be refunded when sumit is back to office since he is travelling a broad, i called few time in Dubai office and no answer and today i visited the Dubai office, and this is the notice was on the door,,I went to Bur dubai police station and complained, they are looking in to,,TO ALL UAE VICTIMS KINDLY GO AND COMPLAIN BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.Dubai police is good, if more complains than this will be BIG amount so they can report him to INTER-POLE ANS BRING HIM TO DUBAI TO PAY BACK ALL THE INNOCENT PEOPLES. Notice Says.. All existing clients who signed the retainer agreement with SEN. IMMIGRATION, kindly contact the Head office in Toronto on the contact information provided below. If you have require any information regarding your application, please make a Note of this details only DO NOT REMOVE. Sumit Sen. Former United Nations lawyer Rhodes Scholar in International Immigration Law at London School of Economics Member, Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC Professional License M042172) President and CEO SEN. IMMIGRATION: The International Immigration Firm Ellesmere Professional Centre 1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209 Toronto, ON M1H 2V6. Canada (T) +[protected], Mobile[protected] [protected]@SenImmigration.com www.SenImmigration.com HOME NUMBER[protected] Mahnaz Sen. Executive Director (T[protected] Mobile[protected] (E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com Tanu Trilokia Manager, Employer Relations Division [protected] Mobile[protected] [protected]@SenImmigration.com (E), www.SenImmigration.com (W) Was this information helpful? | |
Aug 13, 2020 Complaint marked as Resolved | |
 20 Comments | |
Comments
absolutely true !!!11
THIS IS SO RIGHT!!! I already told some of my connections in dubai and canada they saw the documents which I have against sumit sen and I will follow this up! SUMIT SEN MADE A BIT MISTAKE IN HIS LIFE!!
TIME TO GIVE UP SUMIT SEN TIME TO GIVE UP !
SUMIT SEN YOU ARE IN SOO MUCH TROUBLE!
TIME TO GIVE UP SUMIT SEN TIME TO GIVE UP !
SUMIT SEN YOU ARE IN SOO MUCH TROUBLE!
SUMIT SEN I'M ONLY DOING THIS FOR POOR PEOPLE ! THOSE PEOPLE GAVE YOU 2000 3000$ AND YOU TOOK THE MONEY! YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE UP TO SUMIT SEN! IT'S TIME TO PLAY GAME! if you think you are safe in canada you are SOOOOOOOOOOOO WRONG!!!
I have many documents for My self, also get to know some other people who are a victim of his Fraud. if you are reporting him any official body than do post on this wall. so we can do the same to make it more stronger. he got away last time but not this time. do keep us in the Loop !!!
Me too I paid $7, 000 from 2008 to 2010 by instalment, I singed a retainers agreement in 2008 under AEO arange employment opinion with $12, 000 professional fee.$5, 000 to be paid in Dubai and the remaining balance to paid in Canada in 7 instalments.But in 2010 Amina called me that Mr. Sumit Sen was going change the Agreement, He reduce the original fee into $8, 000 and it has to be fully paid in Dubai and I agree because I save some amount of money, then Amina ask me to give a postdated check.
In may 2010 my papers was reviewed by CHC london and they found out that the employers documents are not included.So, I e-mail personaly Mr Gavin Quin and I ask why all the reqired document from him has not been submitted and he was told me that he was informed to SEN Immigration that he is no longer require my service because he hired already.SEN was failed to infom to me as a client and SEN did not find another employer to sponsor me.until such last minute they work on it.
Until now I did not recieved any report from CHC...If SEN did not find sponsor my appliction will be refused.
If you wish to make a complaint you can go to CSIC.COM(Canadian society of Immigration Consultancy)where Sumit is a full member with ID#M042172.Just follow the steps and procedure on how to make complaint, they can revoked his Licence and he will not be a consultant ever if they found out that he break the laws of CSIC.Just watch the vedeo in the website.
All the victims, I encourage you to file a complaint to CSIC...agains summit SEN
In may 2010 my papers was reviewed by CHC london and they found out that the employers documents are not included.So, I e-mail personaly Mr Gavin Quin and I ask why all the reqired document from him has not been submitted and he was told me that he was informed to SEN Immigration that he is no longer require my service because he hired already.SEN was failed to infom to me as a client and SEN did not find another employer to sponsor me.until such last minute they work on it.
Until now I did not recieved any report from CHC...If SEN did not find sponsor my appliction will be refused.
If you wish to make a complaint you can go to CSIC.COM(Canadian society of Immigration Consultancy)where Sumit is a full member with ID#M042172.Just follow the steps and procedure on how to make complaint, they can revoked his Licence and he will not be a consultant ever if they found out that he break the laws of CSIC.Just watch the vedeo in the website.
All the victims, I encourage you to file a complaint to CSIC...agains summit SEN
Its true, All employers were dodgy with incomplete paper works, so now they cant provide updated documents, CHC LONDON is well aware of this fraud's and visiting all locations, specially from the employer of SEN IMMIGRATION,
so your application will never go through, its a case of few other people. i came a cross with.
if you want his licence to be removed than complain to her and fill up the form now, so more people are involved.
Roksana Taleb-Zadeh ...[protected]@csic-scci.ca... she is already working on Sumit Sen fraud case.
if you want your money back than, complain to Dubai police now, file a report, before the sen office in Dubai operation formerly close down,
ACT NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. ...
so your application will never go through, its a case of few other people. i came a cross with.
if you want his licence to be removed than complain to her and fill up the form now, so more people are involved.
Roksana Taleb-Zadeh ...[protected]@csic-scci.ca... she is already working on Sumit Sen fraud case.
if you want your money back than, complain to Dubai police now, file a report, before the sen office in Dubai operation formerly close down,
ACT NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. ...
thanks dear for all these information, I didnt knew about all this things, even i have paid money for Arranged employment and i have acknowledgement also from Canada High Commission (CHC) London office. please tell me now what to do and how we will keep track of our application file number which already we have submitted to CHC - London through Sen immigration ?
URGENT NOTICE
Do Not Remove this Notice
We, SEN Immigration in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have abandoned and left the Dubai office as of Monday, 25 July 2011 without informing the SEN Toronto office.
We have been informed that a message was been posted on the Dubai office door. Please note that the message has not been authorized by SEN Immigration Toronto office. SEN Toronto staff had last spoken to SEN Dubai staff on Saturday, 23 July 2011. Sunday, 24 July 2011 was a holiday.
As you are aware, since the 26 June 2010, the immigration consulting business has been very slow because of extremely restrictive policies of the Government of Canada. Most of the categories – skilled worker, arranged employment, federal investor class, work permits – have been adversely and seriously affected.
Like many immigration consulting companies, SEN Dubai office has been surviving for the past 12 months in the face of extreme hardship.
However, if SEN Toronto were to close the SEN Dubai office, we would have done it in an orderly and organized manner. We would have informed all clients prior to the closure. The unilateral closure of the office on Monday, 25 July 2011 by Dubai staff and that too without prior information to us in Toronto, is a complete shock to us in Toronto.
Please do not worry and DO NOT PANIC. As you have known, the processing of your file is always done from SEN Toronto office. We shall continue doing the same for you in the future.
Please be rest assured that we will continue to assist you from Toronto. Our normal working hours are from 10 am to 5 pm Toronto time Monday to Friday. The Dubai filing department in Toronto opens at 12 noon to 5 pm Toronto time.
Due to the long weekend holiday, SEN Toronto office is closed on Monday, 1st of August 2011.
We thank you for your patience and understanding at this difficult transition for all o[censored]s.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
THIS IS WHAT SEN IMMIGRATION NOTICE IN REGARDS TO THE CLOSURE OF SEN DUBAI OFFICE
Do Not Remove this Notice
We, SEN Immigration in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have abandoned and left the Dubai office as of Monday, 25 July 2011 without informing the SEN Toronto office.
We have been informed that a message was been posted on the Dubai office door. Please note that the message has not been authorized by SEN Immigration Toronto office. SEN Toronto staff had last spoken to SEN Dubai staff on Saturday, 23 July 2011. Sunday, 24 July 2011 was a holiday.
As you are aware, since the 26 June 2010, the immigration consulting business has been very slow because of extremely restrictive policies of the Government of Canada. Most of the categories – skilled worker, arranged employment, federal investor class, work permits – have been adversely and seriously affected.
Like many immigration consulting companies, SEN Dubai office has been surviving for the past 12 months in the face of extreme hardship.
However, if SEN Toronto were to close the SEN Dubai office, we would have done it in an orderly and organized manner. We would have informed all clients prior to the closure. The unilateral closure of the office on Monday, 25 July 2011 by Dubai staff and that too without prior information to us in Toronto, is a complete shock to us in Toronto.
Please do not worry and DO NOT PANIC. As you have known, the processing of your file is always done from SEN Toronto office. We shall continue doing the same for you in the future.
Please be rest assured that we will continue to assist you from Toronto. Our normal working hours are from 10 am to 5 pm Toronto time Monday to Friday. The Dubai filing department in Toronto opens at 12 noon to 5 pm Toronto time.
Due to the long weekend holiday, SEN Toronto office is closed on Monday, 1st of August 2011.
We thank you for your patience and understanding at this difficult transition for all o[censored]s.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
THIS IS WHAT SEN IMMIGRATION NOTICE IN REGARDS TO THE CLOSURE OF SEN DUBAI OFFICE
pwill,
thanks for your information and support...Im just waiting for the result from the CHC before I will do a necessary action...
thanks for your information and support...Im just waiting for the result from the CHC before I will do a necessary action...
URGENT NOTICE - 2
Do Not Remove this Notice
• Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui are CROOKS and CHEATS.
• They have RUN AWAY with over AED45, 000 by cheating people.
• Call and report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to Dubai Police immediately.
Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui have done this to bring discredit to Sen Consultancy/Sumit Sen, and trying to get a ban on the entry of Sumit Sen to Dubai in future.
We, SEN Head Office in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have CHEATED and RUN AWAY with over AED45, 000 CASH from the following clients between 21 July and 23 July 2011:
(1) Shaikh Jahir – AED9, 000
(2) Binod Acharya – AED6, 800
(3) Virendra Kumar Shah – AED5, 000
(4) Hukum Singh – AED7, 500
(5) Bhawan Kumar – AED7, 500
(6) Kuldeep Chand Sharma – AED3, 700
(7) Pradeep Singh – AED3, 600
Without the authorization or knowledge of SEN Head Office in Toronto, Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui cancelled their Employment and Residence Visa on the 21st July 2011.
Even after the cancellation of their Employment and Residence Visa, they continued to ILLEGALLY work at Sen Consultancy on 21 July, 22 July and 23 July 2011. They have met the above clients and Artemy Makhov on 23 July 2011. CCTV footage of Al Attar will prove it.
Between the 21 July 2011 and 23 July 2011, Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui collected CASH over AED45, 000 (Forty Five Thousand Dirhams) and ran away with all the money. They have mentioned that collected the money for Sen Consultancy. TOTAL LIES.
They have STOLEN the money by CHEATING people to sign fake retainer agreements, issued Receipts and collecting money as Security Deposit. THIS IS TOTAL FRAUD committed by Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui.
Report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to Dubai Police. (Imran Siddiqui lives in the Golden Sand Apartments near SEN Dubai office).
• They did not provide any mandatory notice period for the termination of their employment with Sen Consultancy.
• Without authorization, they have illegally collected their full pay and benefits for the whole month of July 2011 when they themselves cancelled the Employment and Residence Visa on 21 July 2011.
Report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to the Dubai Police, and get your money back from them.
Sen Consultancy is going after Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui as well.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
Do Not Remove this Notice
• Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui are CROOKS and CHEATS.
• They have RUN AWAY with over AED45, 000 by cheating people.
• Call and report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to Dubai Police immediately.
Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui have done this to bring discredit to Sen Consultancy/Sumit Sen, and trying to get a ban on the entry of Sumit Sen to Dubai in future.
We, SEN Head Office in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have CHEATED and RUN AWAY with over AED45, 000 CASH from the following clients between 21 July and 23 July 2011:
(1) Shaikh Jahir – AED9, 000
(2) Binod Acharya – AED6, 800
(3) Virendra Kumar Shah – AED5, 000
(4) Hukum Singh – AED7, 500
(5) Bhawan Kumar – AED7, 500
(6) Kuldeep Chand Sharma – AED3, 700
(7) Pradeep Singh – AED3, 600
Without the authorization or knowledge of SEN Head Office in Toronto, Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui cancelled their Employment and Residence Visa on the 21st July 2011.
Even after the cancellation of their Employment and Residence Visa, they continued to ILLEGALLY work at Sen Consultancy on 21 July, 22 July and 23 July 2011. They have met the above clients and Artemy Makhov on 23 July 2011. CCTV footage of Al Attar will prove it.
Between the 21 July 2011 and 23 July 2011, Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui collected CASH over AED45, 000 (Forty Five Thousand Dirhams) and ran away with all the money. They have mentioned that collected the money for Sen Consultancy. TOTAL LIES.
They have STOLEN the money by CHEATING people to sign fake retainer agreements, issued Receipts and collecting money as Security Deposit. THIS IS TOTAL FRAUD committed by Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui.
Report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to Dubai Police. (Imran Siddiqui lives in the Golden Sand Apartments near SEN Dubai office).
• They did not provide any mandatory notice period for the termination of their employment with Sen Consultancy.
• Without authorization, they have illegally collected their full pay and benefits for the whole month of July 2011 when they themselves cancelled the Employment and Residence Visa on 21 July 2011.
Report Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui to the Dubai Police, and get your money back from them.
Sen Consultancy is going after Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui as well.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
URGENT NOTICE
Do Not Remove this Notice
We, SEN Immigration in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have abandoned and left the Dubai office as of Monday, 25 July 2011 without informing the SEN Toronto office.
We have been informed that a message was been posted on the Dubai office door. Please note that the message has not been authorized by SEN Immigration Toronto office. SEN Toronto staff had last spoken to SEN Dubai staff on Saturday, 23 July 2011. Sunday, 24 July 2011 was a holiday.
As you are aware, since the 26 June 2010, the immigration consulting business has been very slow because of extremely restrictive policies of the Government of Canada. Most of the categories – skilled worker, arranged employment, federal investor class, work permits – have been adversely and seriously affected.
Like many immigration consulting companies, SEN Dubai office has been surviving for the past 12 months in the face of extreme hardship.
However, if SEN Toronto were to close the SEN Dubai office, we would have done it in an orderly and organized manner. We would have informed all clients prior to the closure. The unilateral closure of the office on Monday, 25 July 2011 by Dubai staff and that too without prior information to us in Toronto, is a complete shock to us in Toronto.
Please do not worry and DO NOT PANIC. As you have known, the processing of your file is always done from SEN Toronto office. We shall continue doing the same for you in the future.
Please be rest assured that we will continue to assist you from Toronto. Our normal working hours are from 10 am to 5 pm Toronto time Monday to Friday. The Dubai filing department in Toronto opens at 12 noon to 5 pm Toronto time.
Due to the long weekend holiday, SEN Toronto office is closed on Monday, 1st of August 2011.
We thank you for your patience and understanding at this difficult transition for all o[censored]s.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
Do Not Remove this Notice
We, SEN Immigration in Toronto, are shocked to learn that SEN Dubai staff - Amina Ghathesha and Imran Siddiqui - have abandoned and left the Dubai office as of Monday, 25 July 2011 without informing the SEN Toronto office.
We have been informed that a message was been posted on the Dubai office door. Please note that the message has not been authorized by SEN Immigration Toronto office. SEN Toronto staff had last spoken to SEN Dubai staff on Saturday, 23 July 2011. Sunday, 24 July 2011 was a holiday.
As you are aware, since the 26 June 2010, the immigration consulting business has been very slow because of extremely restrictive policies of the Government of Canada. Most of the categories – skilled worker, arranged employment, federal investor class, work permits – have been adversely and seriously affected.
Like many immigration consulting companies, SEN Dubai office has been surviving for the past 12 months in the face of extreme hardship.
However, if SEN Toronto were to close the SEN Dubai office, we would have done it in an orderly and organized manner. We would have informed all clients prior to the closure. The unilateral closure of the office on Monday, 25 July 2011 by Dubai staff and that too without prior information to us in Toronto, is a complete shock to us in Toronto.
Please do not worry and DO NOT PANIC. As you have known, the processing of your file is always done from SEN Toronto office. We shall continue doing the same for you in the future.
Please be rest assured that we will continue to assist you from Toronto. Our normal working hours are from 10 am to 5 pm Toronto time Monday to Friday. The Dubai filing department in Toronto opens at 12 noon to 5 pm Toronto time.
Due to the long weekend holiday, SEN Toronto office is closed on Monday, 1st of August 2011.
We thank you for your patience and understanding at this difficult transition for all o[censored]s.
Best wishes,
Mahnaz Sen
Executive Director
SEN Immigration
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON Canada M1H 2V6. Canada
(T[protected]F[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
Pathetic explanations from Managing director of the company, I am sure they are operating form some cave in Afghanistan and no idea of outside world.
When I signed up there were 20 people working for the company, now office is shut,
Easy thing to say, staff took the money go and report them, take the money from them, we don’t know these people, all the employees are Crook and fraud, we owner/director live in bunker in the war zone. WHAT A [censored] .
They are all big gang, each and every body is involve, they all took the money and shared’ then blame their own staff. Who also took their commissions, now run away? And then write stupid things, they been doing it since long time it’s all over the blogs. Many years, READ EARLY COMMENTS.
So many people can’t lie only these [censored]s are lying
What a B**ds they all are.
My contract signed by MANAGER, Guarv Sharma, then MANAGER, Mazz Ali, then MANAGER.Amina, now they all are crook’s and fraud we are the good people, we don’t know nothing about the money you paid, so pay us more and more and more, new people will come their own relative from BANGLADESH and then start cheating new people, and then again and again and again.
Dear All, in real world these excuses ARE for STUPID people, not us.
Dubai police has 17 cases against them past six months. They been recovering money for people and visited the SEN Consultancy office regularly, also CID knows it. NOW office shut, SO ARABIC SPONSOR is looking for people. And he has to find all these fraud people and punish each and every culprit. BECAUSE HE IS RESPONSIBLE to pay back .
Report your case now TO BUR DUBAI, OFFICER NAME MR.ABU BAKAR IS INVESTIGATING THESE MATTERS, since they are just blaming the staff, and not doing any work, all of them are involve part of the same gang, FROM ONE GUY THEY TOOK $20000 DOLLARS AND SOLD HIM FAKE JOB OFFER. So amount is increasing people are increasing. THIS IS GOOD
KEEP REPORTING.
My job offer never came, I should have inform police and got my money earlier., I not had trusted the manager AMINA that, sumit is travelling, your check is ready, waiting sign, will give you as soon it signed.
NOW THEY ALL GONE……….
THIS IS DUBAI, ONLY ARABIC GUY IS IMPORTANT, SO TELL HIM, before it’s too late.
CROOOKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
When I signed up there were 20 people working for the company, now office is shut,
Easy thing to say, staff took the money go and report them, take the money from them, we don’t know these people, all the employees are Crook and fraud, we owner/director live in bunker in the war zone. WHAT A [censored] .
They are all big gang, each and every body is involve, they all took the money and shared’ then blame their own staff. Who also took their commissions, now run away? And then write stupid things, they been doing it since long time it’s all over the blogs. Many years, READ EARLY COMMENTS.
So many people can’t lie only these [censored]s are lying
What a B**ds they all are.
My contract signed by MANAGER, Guarv Sharma, then MANAGER, Mazz Ali, then MANAGER.Amina, now they all are crook’s and fraud we are the good people, we don’t know nothing about the money you paid, so pay us more and more and more, new people will come their own relative from BANGLADESH and then start cheating new people, and then again and again and again.
Dear All, in real world these excuses ARE for STUPID people, not us.
Dubai police has 17 cases against them past six months. They been recovering money for people and visited the SEN Consultancy office regularly, also CID knows it. NOW office shut, SO ARABIC SPONSOR is looking for people. And he has to find all these fraud people and punish each and every culprit. BECAUSE HE IS RESPONSIBLE to pay back .
Report your case now TO BUR DUBAI, OFFICER NAME MR.ABU BAKAR IS INVESTIGATING THESE MATTERS, since they are just blaming the staff, and not doing any work, all of them are involve part of the same gang, FROM ONE GUY THEY TOOK $20000 DOLLARS AND SOLD HIM FAKE JOB OFFER. So amount is increasing people are increasing. THIS IS GOOD
KEEP REPORTING.
My job offer never came, I should have inform police and got my money earlier., I not had trusted the manager AMINA that, sumit is travelling, your check is ready, waiting sign, will give you as soon it signed.
NOW THEY ALL GONE……….
THIS IS DUBAI, ONLY ARABIC GUY IS IMPORTANT, SO TELL HIM, before it’s too late.
CROOOKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Roksana Taleb-Zadeh ...[protected]@csic-scci.ca... she is already working on Sumit Sen fraud case.
REPORT OT HER, SEND YOUR RECEIPT WITH CONTRACT SCAN COPIES. LET THEM FIND THE TRUTH.
I DID IT, NOW ITS YOUR TURN.
REPORT OT HER, SEND YOUR RECEIPT WITH CONTRACT SCAN COPIES. LET THEM FIND THE TRUTH.
I DID IT, NOW ITS YOUR TURN.
Pwill,
Last week I went to Bur Dubai Police station to report and complain about the closure of the SEN Dubai office but the police officer was advice me to go to Dubai Court because this kind of case is not involve in police criminal case...I am trying to find a lawyer who can help us to file a case against this crook and fraud people who steal our money...
You mentioned about CSIC where Sumit is a full member, where we can file a complaint against him and his team.Yes I agree but, The CSIC was removed and turn over to the ICCRC(Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council) in line with the new rules (Bill C-35.)There is no way we can make a complin now, we have to wait for sometimes.
News Release
Tougher rules governing immigration consultants enacted and new regulator announced
Ottawa, June 28, 2011 — Legislation cracking down on crooked immigration consultants will come into force on June 30, 2011, Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney announced today.
At the same time, oversight of the consultant community is being turned over to the newly created Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC). “The Government of Canada has promised to crack down on crooked immigration consultants and their shady practices, and with Bill C-35, we now have the tools, ” said the Minister.
Bill C-35 strengthens the rules governing those who charge their clients for immigration advice or representation, making it an offence for anyone other than an accredited immigration representative to conduct business, for a fee or other consideration, at any stage of an application or proceeding. It also increases penalties and fines for unauthorized representation and allows for more government oversight in order to improve the way in which immigration consultants are regulated.
With the designation of the ICCRC as the regulator of immigration consultants, consultants who are currently members in good standing of the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) can begin to register with the ICCRC on June 30, 2011.
Immigration representatives must be either members in good standing of a provincial or territorial law society, including paralegals; members of the Chambre des notaires du Québec; or members of the governing body for immigration consultants.
A 120-day transitional period will be put in place to ensure a smooth transition and continuity of service for both CSIC members currently in good standing and their clients during the transition to the ICCRC. The transition period will end on October 28, 2011.
After a notice was published on March 19, 2011, in the Canada Gazette, Part I, proposing the ICCRC be designated the regulator of immigration consultants, over 70 percent of the public comments received during the 30-day consultation period supported the proposal to establish a new regulator of immigration consultants.
“The ICCRC has committed to accountability, transparency and good governance and has pledged to work to protect the interests of consumers, ” added Minister Kenney. “Their efforts, backed by strong new legislation, will allow us to better serve people through our immigration processes and protect potential immigrants, all while improving the integrity of Canada’s immigration system.”
•Backgrounder 1: Transitioning to the ICCRC – the designated regulator of immigration consultants
•Backgrounder 2: Highlights of Bill C-35
•Frequently Asked Questions
•www.immigration.gc.ca/antifraud
Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CitImmCanada.
For further information (media only), please contact:
Kasra Nejatian
Minister’s Office
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
Media Relations
Communications Branch
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
[protected]
[protected]@cic.gc.ca
BECAUSE AT CSIC THERE ARE LOT OF COMPLAINTS
Department of Citizenship and Immigration
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)
Executive summary
Issue: In 2003, the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) was established as an independent, federally incorporated not-for-profit body operating at arm’s length from the federal government and responsible for regulating paid immigration consultants. Despite the establishment of CSIC, there have been, through the years, several complaints from the public and from within the profession about unacceptable practices of immigration consultants. In 2008, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (Standing Committee) heard a wide range of complaints from the public, ranging from the opinion that the decision making of CSIC lacked transparency and was not conducted democratically, to the view that membership fees were too high and the Board of Directors was not accountable to its membership. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) recognizes the importance of the analysis undertaken by the Standing Committee. The complaints recognized by the Standing Committee appear to indicate that the current governance and accountability framework within which CSIC operates does not ensure that immigration consultants are being adequately regulated in the public interest with respect to the provision of professional and ethical consultation, representation and advice.
Description: Citizenship and Immigration Canada proposes to remove the reference to CSIC from the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (Regulations) as a body whose members are authorized representatives and to replace it with a reference to the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC). A transitional provision is also proposed whereby persons who are members in good standing of CSIC immediately before the coming into force of the proposed regulatory amendments would be permitted to, for a fee, represent, advise or consult with applicants for a period of 120 days following the coming into force of those amendments. Such a provision would ensure continuity of service, and protect applicants to immigration processes as well as the livelihoods of the former CSIC members.
Cost-benefit statement: Improved regulation of immigration consultants would result in better protection for applicants to immigration processes and for the integrity of the immigration program. Accordingly, public confidence in the immigration system would increase through the recognition of an entity with solid governance and accountability arrangements. Better governance would improve the integrity of the immigration consultant industry as well as the Government’s immigration program. Furthermore, a proposed reduction in membership fees would benefit immigration consultants by bringing such fees more in line with those of their legal association counterparts and making membership more affordable. It may also make membership more attractive to would-be consultants or those not operating under regulatory oversight such as ghost consultants.
The proposed amendment would likely lead to the winding down of CSIC and the Canadian Migration Institute (CMI). The Government of Canada would also be required to absorb the $500, 000 contribution provided to CSIC at its inception and provide further money to the new entity to support its start-up requirements.
The total estimated cost to replace CSIC would be approximately $3.6 million. These costs can be largely attributed to start-up and transitional costs. The total corresponding estimated benefits of the proposed Regulations is $11.2 million, largely due to a commitment by the ICCRC to reduce membership fees. The result is an anticipated net benefit of $7.6 million. A full cost-benefit analysis report is available upon request.
Business and consumer impacts: CSIC membership would likely drop, together with participation in the for-profit programs operated by the organization and its subsidiaries. There could be minor disruptions in the quality of service to consumers during the transition to a new organization, but in the long term, the quality of consultation, representation and advice is anticipated to increase substantially based on the submission of the ICCRC through the public selection process initiated by CIC to identify a governing body for recognition as the regulator of immigration consultants.
Domestic and international coordination and cooperation: Most provinces and territories require third parties with whom they interact on immigration matters to be members of the provincial bar, the Chambre des notaires du Québec or CSIC. Intergovernmental discussions were also undertaken, and a formal letter was sent to all provinces and territories requesting recommendations regarding the public selection process to identify a governing body for recognition as the regulator of immigration consultants. Provinces and territories have indicated their support for the proposed approach and for strong management and regulation of the immigrant consultant industry.
Issue
In 2004, the Regulations were amended to ensure that only persons who were authorized representatives could, for a fee, represent, advise or consult with a person who was the subject of a proceeding or application under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The term “authorized representative” was defined in the amendments as a member in good standing of a bar of a province, the Chambre des notaires du Québec or the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC). The primary intent of this change was to enhance public confidence in Canada’s immigration program.
The Regulations were amended in response to persistent and credible reports that some unscrupulous immigration consultants, both in Canada and abroad, were facilitating people smuggling and fabricating documents permitting foreign nationals to enter Canada illegally. Certain consultants who held themselves out as experts had no training or experience in handling complex files. Others made false promises, and charged exorbitant fees for their services. In a number of reported cases, consultants charged fees for an unfulfilled promise to file immigration applications, while providing bogus file reference numbers and advising clients that the Canadian government has refused the application.
In 2003, CSIC was incorporated as an independent, federally incorporated not-for-profit body operating at arm’s length from the federal government and in 2004 they were recognized in the Regulations as the organization responsible for regulating paid immigration consultants (who are not lawyers or members of the Chambre des notaires du Québec). According to the December 1, 2003 Immigration Consultants Program Contribution Agreement (CA) between CIC and the then newly established CSIC, the primary objective of CSIC was “to enhance public confidence, preserve the integrity in the immigration program and protect vulnerable clients by providing them a recourse mechanism where they have been given inappropriate advice.” At that time, the Government committed to stakeholders that should CSIC fail to fulfill its central role of consumer protection and maintaining professional standards, the Government would take action to remove its recognition of CSIC members. (see footnote 1)
Over six years later, concerns about the regulation of immigration consultants persist. In 2008, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (Standing Committee) undertook a study of the immigration consulting industry. The Standing Committee travelled throughout Canada over a three-week period to hear from witnesses. These witnesses included, among others, members of CSIC, the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). In June of 2008, the Committee issued a report, summarizing its findings, entitled Regulating Immigration Consultants.
The analysis undertaken by the Standing Committee raised concerns regarding the current practice of the regulation of immigration consultants and its potential impact on public confidence in the immigration program. The Committee stated that it had heard from “a number of immigration consultants across the country, many of whom expressed great dissatisfaction with the way CSIC is currently governed.” Consequently, it is proposed by CIC that a federal regulator with a strong governance and accountability framework would provide efficient and effective regulation of immigration consultants, which in turn would support Canada’s long-term immigration objectives as well as bolster public confidence in the immigration system.
Objectives
The intent of the proposed Regulations is to better protect applicants to immigration processes and enhance public confidence in the immigration system by recognizing a regulator of immigration consultants that has demonstrated that it meets the necessary organizational competencies to effectively regulate immigration consultants.
Description
This regulatory amendment proposes to remove the reference to the “Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants incorporated under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act on October 8, 2003” from the definition of “authorized representative” under section 2 of the Regulations. This would have the effect of ending CSIC’s ability to act as a body that regulates the activities of immigration consultants for the purposes of IRPA and thus removing the recognition of its members as “authorized representatives” under the Regulations.
This regulatory amendment would replace CSIC with the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC), taking into consideration the report of the Selection Committee following the Call for Submissions published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on August 28, 2010, and that ended on December 29, 2010. The Selection Committee was composed of four external experts and three senior public servants — including two from CIC and one from CBSA — who examined the submissions received in response to the Call for Submissions.
Finally, a transitional provision would permit persons who are members in good standing of CSIC immediately before the coming into force of the proposed regulatory amendments to be able to continue to consult with, advise and represent persons for a period of 120 days following the coming into force of the proposed amendments. Such a provision would ensure continuity of service, and protect applicants to immigration processes as well as the livelihoods of the former CSIC members.
Regulatory and non-regulatory options considered
Many options were considered to address the lack of public confidence in CSIC, including the introduction of new stand-alone legislation to re-establish the body using a law society model.
It was acknowledged that, considering CSIC’s arms-length status, CIC had limited ability to affect the organization’s practices. The concerns with CSIC related to its core governance mechanisms and the legitimacy of such mechanisms as perceived by its membership, by Parliament and by the public.
A legislative approach to reconstitute CSIC as a statutory body, as suggested by the House of Commons Standing Committee, was rejected due to concerns about a lengthy and resource intensive implementation process. While CIC has not initiated such changes as recommended by the Standing Committee, it seeks to move forward with the legislative changes to IRPA found in Bill C-35, which would strengthen government oversight of the regulator and should improve discipline of its members through the information sharing provision.
Consistent with the selection factors outlined in the Call for Submissions published in the CanadaGazette, Part I, in August 2010, ICCRC has demonstrated that it meets the necessary organizational competencies to effectively regulate immigration consultants. It has also demonstrated the ability to foster a culture of transparency and openness in order to be properly accountable to its membership and to the Canadian public. The proposed entity has demonstrated its commitment to sound financial management and reporting, as well as a plan to ensure a membership base that would provide for the sustainability of the body through the promotion of membership to qualified practitioners. By proposing fee reductions, it is believed that members will get better value for their money, belong to an entity that practices good financial management and creates an incentive for new consultants or “ghost” consultants to participate in a legitimate association that provides support and oversight.
Benefits and costs
Overview
In identifying the costs and benefits of designating a new entity to regulate immigration consultants, the baseline was established against which all incremental costs and benefits were measured. The established baseline is the situation where CSIC will continue to operate and govern the industry in its current form. It is recognized that no organization remains static and that CSIC may reform and improve accountability and achieve overall efficiency gains. However, because it is not possible to predict the operational actions of CSIC over the study period with any certainty, CIC has chosen to measure all impacts from the current situation.
The baseline is then compared with the option to create a new governing body. In this case, it is assumed that CSIC will no longer perform the function of governing immigration consultants and thus will cease to operate for that purpose. ICCRC will be designated to provide the same functions as CSIC with a commitment to enhanced standards of competence, integrity, accountability, viability and good governance.
The regulatory change generates an overall net benefit to society because it supports the creation of a body that provides good governance, accountability and integrity to immigration consultants as well as to Canada’s overall immigration programs. It is also understood that the mechanisms proposed by ICCRC for the rigorous assessment of the competence of prospective members and procedurally fair and effective complaint and discipline mechanisms, as well as certification procedures, would contribute to more effective management of the immigration consultants industry.
The total estimated cost for the analysis period (2011–2020) for the option that would create a new governing body to replace CSIC is approximately $3.6 million. These costs can be largely attributed to start-up and transitional costs. The total corresponding estimated benefits of the proposed regulation is $11.2 million, largely due to a commitment by the ICCRC to reduce membership fees. By comparing the quantitative costs and benefits of both scenarios, it is estimated that the proposed amendment would generate a monetized benefit in the range of $7.6 million (PV) over the analysis
FOR MORE DETAILS LOG ON TO WWW.CIC.GC.CA
Last week I went to Bur Dubai Police station to report and complain about the closure of the SEN Dubai office but the police officer was advice me to go to Dubai Court because this kind of case is not involve in police criminal case...I am trying to find a lawyer who can help us to file a case against this crook and fraud people who steal our money...
You mentioned about CSIC where Sumit is a full member, where we can file a complaint against him and his team.Yes I agree but, The CSIC was removed and turn over to the ICCRC(Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council) in line with the new rules (Bill C-35.)There is no way we can make a complin now, we have to wait for sometimes.
News Release
Tougher rules governing immigration consultants enacted and new regulator announced
Ottawa, June 28, 2011 — Legislation cracking down on crooked immigration consultants will come into force on June 30, 2011, Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney announced today.
At the same time, oversight of the consultant community is being turned over to the newly created Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC). “The Government of Canada has promised to crack down on crooked immigration consultants and their shady practices, and with Bill C-35, we now have the tools, ” said the Minister.
Bill C-35 strengthens the rules governing those who charge their clients for immigration advice or representation, making it an offence for anyone other than an accredited immigration representative to conduct business, for a fee or other consideration, at any stage of an application or proceeding. It also increases penalties and fines for unauthorized representation and allows for more government oversight in order to improve the way in which immigration consultants are regulated.
With the designation of the ICCRC as the regulator of immigration consultants, consultants who are currently members in good standing of the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) can begin to register with the ICCRC on June 30, 2011.
Immigration representatives must be either members in good standing of a provincial or territorial law society, including paralegals; members of the Chambre des notaires du Québec; or members of the governing body for immigration consultants.
A 120-day transitional period will be put in place to ensure a smooth transition and continuity of service for both CSIC members currently in good standing and their clients during the transition to the ICCRC. The transition period will end on October 28, 2011.
After a notice was published on March 19, 2011, in the Canada Gazette, Part I, proposing the ICCRC be designated the regulator of immigration consultants, over 70 percent of the public comments received during the 30-day consultation period supported the proposal to establish a new regulator of immigration consultants.
“The ICCRC has committed to accountability, transparency and good governance and has pledged to work to protect the interests of consumers, ” added Minister Kenney. “Their efforts, backed by strong new legislation, will allow us to better serve people through our immigration processes and protect potential immigrants, all while improving the integrity of Canada’s immigration system.”
•Backgrounder 1: Transitioning to the ICCRC – the designated regulator of immigration consultants
•Backgrounder 2: Highlights of Bill C-35
•Frequently Asked Questions
•www.immigration.gc.ca/antifraud
Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CitImmCanada.
For further information (media only), please contact:
Kasra Nejatian
Minister’s Office
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
Media Relations
Communications Branch
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
[protected]
[protected]@cic.gc.ca
BECAUSE AT CSIC THERE ARE LOT OF COMPLAINTS
Department of Citizenship and Immigration
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)
Executive summary
Issue: In 2003, the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) was established as an independent, federally incorporated not-for-profit body operating at arm’s length from the federal government and responsible for regulating paid immigration consultants. Despite the establishment of CSIC, there have been, through the years, several complaints from the public and from within the profession about unacceptable practices of immigration consultants. In 2008, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (Standing Committee) heard a wide range of complaints from the public, ranging from the opinion that the decision making of CSIC lacked transparency and was not conducted democratically, to the view that membership fees were too high and the Board of Directors was not accountable to its membership. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) recognizes the importance of the analysis undertaken by the Standing Committee. The complaints recognized by the Standing Committee appear to indicate that the current governance and accountability framework within which CSIC operates does not ensure that immigration consultants are being adequately regulated in the public interest with respect to the provision of professional and ethical consultation, representation and advice.
Description: Citizenship and Immigration Canada proposes to remove the reference to CSIC from the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (Regulations) as a body whose members are authorized representatives and to replace it with a reference to the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC). A transitional provision is also proposed whereby persons who are members in good standing of CSIC immediately before the coming into force of the proposed regulatory amendments would be permitted to, for a fee, represent, advise or consult with applicants for a period of 120 days following the coming into force of those amendments. Such a provision would ensure continuity of service, and protect applicants to immigration processes as well as the livelihoods of the former CSIC members.
Cost-benefit statement: Improved regulation of immigration consultants would result in better protection for applicants to immigration processes and for the integrity of the immigration program. Accordingly, public confidence in the immigration system would increase through the recognition of an entity with solid governance and accountability arrangements. Better governance would improve the integrity of the immigration consultant industry as well as the Government’s immigration program. Furthermore, a proposed reduction in membership fees would benefit immigration consultants by bringing such fees more in line with those of their legal association counterparts and making membership more affordable. It may also make membership more attractive to would-be consultants or those not operating under regulatory oversight such as ghost consultants.
The proposed amendment would likely lead to the winding down of CSIC and the Canadian Migration Institute (CMI). The Government of Canada would also be required to absorb the $500, 000 contribution provided to CSIC at its inception and provide further money to the new entity to support its start-up requirements.
The total estimated cost to replace CSIC would be approximately $3.6 million. These costs can be largely attributed to start-up and transitional costs. The total corresponding estimated benefits of the proposed Regulations is $11.2 million, largely due to a commitment by the ICCRC to reduce membership fees. The result is an anticipated net benefit of $7.6 million. A full cost-benefit analysis report is available upon request.
Business and consumer impacts: CSIC membership would likely drop, together with participation in the for-profit programs operated by the organization and its subsidiaries. There could be minor disruptions in the quality of service to consumers during the transition to a new organization, but in the long term, the quality of consultation, representation and advice is anticipated to increase substantially based on the submission of the ICCRC through the public selection process initiated by CIC to identify a governing body for recognition as the regulator of immigration consultants.
Domestic and international coordination and cooperation: Most provinces and territories require third parties with whom they interact on immigration matters to be members of the provincial bar, the Chambre des notaires du Québec or CSIC. Intergovernmental discussions were also undertaken, and a formal letter was sent to all provinces and territories requesting recommendations regarding the public selection process to identify a governing body for recognition as the regulator of immigration consultants. Provinces and territories have indicated their support for the proposed approach and for strong management and regulation of the immigrant consultant industry.
Issue
In 2004, the Regulations were amended to ensure that only persons who were authorized representatives could, for a fee, represent, advise or consult with a person who was the subject of a proceeding or application under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The term “authorized representative” was defined in the amendments as a member in good standing of a bar of a province, the Chambre des notaires du Québec or the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC). The primary intent of this change was to enhance public confidence in Canada’s immigration program.
The Regulations were amended in response to persistent and credible reports that some unscrupulous immigration consultants, both in Canada and abroad, were facilitating people smuggling and fabricating documents permitting foreign nationals to enter Canada illegally. Certain consultants who held themselves out as experts had no training or experience in handling complex files. Others made false promises, and charged exorbitant fees for their services. In a number of reported cases, consultants charged fees for an unfulfilled promise to file immigration applications, while providing bogus file reference numbers and advising clients that the Canadian government has refused the application.
In 2003, CSIC was incorporated as an independent, federally incorporated not-for-profit body operating at arm’s length from the federal government and in 2004 they were recognized in the Regulations as the organization responsible for regulating paid immigration consultants (who are not lawyers or members of the Chambre des notaires du Québec). According to the December 1, 2003 Immigration Consultants Program Contribution Agreement (CA) between CIC and the then newly established CSIC, the primary objective of CSIC was “to enhance public confidence, preserve the integrity in the immigration program and protect vulnerable clients by providing them a recourse mechanism where they have been given inappropriate advice.” At that time, the Government committed to stakeholders that should CSIC fail to fulfill its central role of consumer protection and maintaining professional standards, the Government would take action to remove its recognition of CSIC members. (see footnote 1)
Over six years later, concerns about the regulation of immigration consultants persist. In 2008, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (Standing Committee) undertook a study of the immigration consulting industry. The Standing Committee travelled throughout Canada over a three-week period to hear from witnesses. These witnesses included, among others, members of CSIC, the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). In June of 2008, the Committee issued a report, summarizing its findings, entitled Regulating Immigration Consultants.
The analysis undertaken by the Standing Committee raised concerns regarding the current practice of the regulation of immigration consultants and its potential impact on public confidence in the immigration program. The Committee stated that it had heard from “a number of immigration consultants across the country, many of whom expressed great dissatisfaction with the way CSIC is currently governed.” Consequently, it is proposed by CIC that a federal regulator with a strong governance and accountability framework would provide efficient and effective regulation of immigration consultants, which in turn would support Canada’s long-term immigration objectives as well as bolster public confidence in the immigration system.
Objectives
The intent of the proposed Regulations is to better protect applicants to immigration processes and enhance public confidence in the immigration system by recognizing a regulator of immigration consultants that has demonstrated that it meets the necessary organizational competencies to effectively regulate immigration consultants.
Description
This regulatory amendment proposes to remove the reference to the “Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants incorporated under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act on October 8, 2003” from the definition of “authorized representative” under section 2 of the Regulations. This would have the effect of ending CSIC’s ability to act as a body that regulates the activities of immigration consultants for the purposes of IRPA and thus removing the recognition of its members as “authorized representatives” under the Regulations.
This regulatory amendment would replace CSIC with the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC), taking into consideration the report of the Selection Committee following the Call for Submissions published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on August 28, 2010, and that ended on December 29, 2010. The Selection Committee was composed of four external experts and three senior public servants — including two from CIC and one from CBSA — who examined the submissions received in response to the Call for Submissions.
Finally, a transitional provision would permit persons who are members in good standing of CSIC immediately before the coming into force of the proposed regulatory amendments to be able to continue to consult with, advise and represent persons for a period of 120 days following the coming into force of the proposed amendments. Such a provision would ensure continuity of service, and protect applicants to immigration processes as well as the livelihoods of the former CSIC members.
Regulatory and non-regulatory options considered
Many options were considered to address the lack of public confidence in CSIC, including the introduction of new stand-alone legislation to re-establish the body using a law society model.
It was acknowledged that, considering CSIC’s arms-length status, CIC had limited ability to affect the organization’s practices. The concerns with CSIC related to its core governance mechanisms and the legitimacy of such mechanisms as perceived by its membership, by Parliament and by the public.
A legislative approach to reconstitute CSIC as a statutory body, as suggested by the House of Commons Standing Committee, was rejected due to concerns about a lengthy and resource intensive implementation process. While CIC has not initiated such changes as recommended by the Standing Committee, it seeks to move forward with the legislative changes to IRPA found in Bill C-35, which would strengthen government oversight of the regulator and should improve discipline of its members through the information sharing provision.
Consistent with the selection factors outlined in the Call for Submissions published in the CanadaGazette, Part I, in August 2010, ICCRC has demonstrated that it meets the necessary organizational competencies to effectively regulate immigration consultants. It has also demonstrated the ability to foster a culture of transparency and openness in order to be properly accountable to its membership and to the Canadian public. The proposed entity has demonstrated its commitment to sound financial management and reporting, as well as a plan to ensure a membership base that would provide for the sustainability of the body through the promotion of membership to qualified practitioners. By proposing fee reductions, it is believed that members will get better value for their money, belong to an entity that practices good financial management and creates an incentive for new consultants or “ghost” consultants to participate in a legitimate association that provides support and oversight.
Benefits and costs
Overview
In identifying the costs and benefits of designating a new entity to regulate immigration consultants, the baseline was established against which all incremental costs and benefits were measured. The established baseline is the situation where CSIC will continue to operate and govern the industry in its current form. It is recognized that no organization remains static and that CSIC may reform and improve accountability and achieve overall efficiency gains. However, because it is not possible to predict the operational actions of CSIC over the study period with any certainty, CIC has chosen to measure all impacts from the current situation.
The baseline is then compared with the option to create a new governing body. In this case, it is assumed that CSIC will no longer perform the function of governing immigration consultants and thus will cease to operate for that purpose. ICCRC will be designated to provide the same functions as CSIC with a commitment to enhanced standards of competence, integrity, accountability, viability and good governance.
The regulatory change generates an overall net benefit to society because it supports the creation of a body that provides good governance, accountability and integrity to immigration consultants as well as to Canada’s overall immigration programs. It is also understood that the mechanisms proposed by ICCRC for the rigorous assessment of the competence of prospective members and procedurally fair and effective complaint and discipline mechanisms, as well as certification procedures, would contribute to more effective management of the immigration consultants industry.
The total estimated cost for the analysis period (2011–2020) for the option that would create a new governing body to replace CSIC is approximately $3.6 million. These costs can be largely attributed to start-up and transitional costs. The total corresponding estimated benefits of the proposed regulation is $11.2 million, largely due to a commitment by the ICCRC to reduce membership fees. By comparing the quantitative costs and benefits of both scenarios, it is estimated that the proposed amendment would generate a monetized benefit in the range of $7.6 million (PV) over the analysis
FOR MORE DETAILS LOG ON TO WWW.CIC.GC.CA
Hee hee hee...hoo hoo hoo...haaa...HOW DO I LAUGH, I DONT KNOW. THIS HAD TO HAPPEN ONE DAY. ALL WICKETS ARE DOWN ONE BY ONE ONLY BECAUSE OF CHEATING AND FRAUDS. SUMIT SEN, THE SO CALLED WORLD FAMOUS RENOWNED LAWYER...BLAH BLAH BLAH (EVEN HIS NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOUR MIGHT NOT KNOW WHO IS THIS ...HAA HAA HAA) IS DUMPED IN THE DEEP . NOW HE GOT A BIG BAMBOO IN HIS FAT ...SS !!! SOME MORE TO FOLLOW!!! HEE HEE HEE. HE IS IN SO MUCH DEEP THAT HE HAD TO PUT HIS WIFE TO FACE THE BULLET...COWARD # 1. CORRECTLY SO, SHE ALSO PLAYED A BIG ROLE IN ALL THESE NUISANCE OTHERWISE SHE WOULD HAVE GONE AFTER LEARNING THAT FAT A...S SLEPT WITH A CHICK IN DUBAI'S HOTEL. CAN YOU PLEASE WRITE HERE THE COLOUR AND MADE OF THE PANTY? IF YOU SEE HIM OR HIS FAMILY IN DUBAI OR IN INDIA, JUST ...x x x x... THEM ON THE SPOT AND THEN HANDOVER THEM TO POLICE. JUST IMAGINE THE FUTURE OF THEIR CHILDREN WHEN THEY WILL COME TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR PARENTS' MISDEEDS.
THIS IS TO INFORM TO ALL CLIENTS TO FORWARD THEIR COMPLAINTS TO ICCRC, THE NEW BODY FOR IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS. FAT ...SS!! SHOULD NOT BE SPARED. WE NEED OUR HARD EARNED MONEY BACK ONE BY ONE.
THIS IS TO INFORM TO ALL CLIENTS TO FORWARD THEIR COMPLAINTS TO ICCRC, THE NEW BODY FOR IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS. FAT ...SS!! SHOULD NOT BE SPARED. WE NEED OUR HARD EARNED MONEY BACK ONE BY ONE.
These Donkeys never went to college, FOR SURE !!!
THIS MAHNAZ SEN CLAIMS TO BE A MANAGING DIRECTOR, WRITING FROM THE SAME ID FROM WHICH SHE IS ACCUSING ALL HER EMPLOYEES TO BE CROOK FRAUD AND CHEATER. AND I AM NOT, , , , , , , , , , , , According to her, we are the SAINT'S ALL THE SATAN'S HAVE RUN AWAY.
USING THE SAME ID AND SAYING THAT,
WE WENT TO DUBAI POLICE AND NO BODY IS TAKING COMPLAIN, SO MAKE A CASE.
WHERE MY COMPLAIN IS ACTIVE AND INVESTIGATED BY CID, I HAVE POSTED Repeatedly AND AGAIN ...
THIS PROVES THAT...THEY ARE CHEATERS...
THESE PEOPLE ARE SO STUBBORN AND SUCH STUPID FOOLS, WHO CAN NOT FOOL US,
PLEASE PLEASE DON'T BE FOOL BY THEM, GO AND REPORT...NOW.
WRITING BY THEM SELVES AND PROVOKING US NOT TO REPORT.
CHECK THE ID'S AND BE A JUDGE YOUR SELVE...WHAT IS WHAT...
I HAVE RECEIVED A POSITIVE REPLY FROM INDIAN EMBASSY IN DUBAI; THEY ARE INVESTIGATION THIS MATTER FURTHER. ..GO AND TELL THEM ALSO, , , , , , NOW, , ,
DON'T BE FOOL BY THEM, , , , ANY MORE, READ THEIR COMMENTS FROM SAME USER ID AGAIN AND AGAIN ALL OVER AGAIN, , , , , , NOW THEY BEEN CAUGHT, , SO THEY WILL MAKE ANOTHER ID AND WRITE POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT THEM SELVES, , , , ,
DO NOT BELIEVE ANY THING WHAT THEY WRITE ANY MORE ...!!!
YOU BA******S STOP WRITING A LIE AND STOP CHEATING PEOPLE, GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK NOW, , , , NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
SUCH A STUPID [censored]S
REPORT TO BUR DUBAI POLICE NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...⇄
I HAVE VISITED LAWYERS OFFICE IN DUBAI, , , , , Galadari and Associates, Advocates and Legal Consultants, , , Tel: +[protected]
Galadari and Associates Building
Al Ghubaibah Road
Opposite UAE Central Bank
Dubai
PO Box 7992
Dubai
IF ANY ONE WANTS TO FILE THE FRAUD CASE IN UAE COURT OF LAW, THAN, , YOU GET 11% OF ONE YEARS COMPENSATION, IF YOU ARE WAITING SINCE 2 YEARS THAN 22% THAN IT GETS MORE AND MORE, , , , PLUS THE TOTAL AMOUNT, , , , CAN ONLY BE AGAINST THE COMPANY IN UAE...
COMPANY OR ARABIC SPONSOR WILL PAY FOR THIS……………YOU WILL GET THE MONEY BACK…
DO IT NOW BEFORE ITS TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LATEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE...
THIS MAHNAZ SEN CLAIMS TO BE A MANAGING DIRECTOR, WRITING FROM THE SAME ID FROM WHICH SHE IS ACCUSING ALL HER EMPLOYEES TO BE CROOK FRAUD AND CHEATER. AND I AM NOT, , , , , , , , , , , , According to her, we are the SAINT'S ALL THE SATAN'S HAVE RUN AWAY.
USING THE SAME ID AND SAYING THAT,
WE WENT TO DUBAI POLICE AND NO BODY IS TAKING COMPLAIN, SO MAKE A CASE.
WHERE MY COMPLAIN IS ACTIVE AND INVESTIGATED BY CID, I HAVE POSTED Repeatedly AND AGAIN ...
THIS PROVES THAT...THEY ARE CHEATERS...
THESE PEOPLE ARE SO STUBBORN AND SUCH STUPID FOOLS, WHO CAN NOT FOOL US,
PLEASE PLEASE DON'T BE FOOL BY THEM, GO AND REPORT...NOW.
WRITING BY THEM SELVES AND PROVOKING US NOT TO REPORT.
CHECK THE ID'S AND BE A JUDGE YOUR SELVE...WHAT IS WHAT...
I HAVE RECEIVED A POSITIVE REPLY FROM INDIAN EMBASSY IN DUBAI; THEY ARE INVESTIGATION THIS MATTER FURTHER. ..GO AND TELL THEM ALSO, , , , , , NOW, , ,
DON'T BE FOOL BY THEM, , , , ANY MORE, READ THEIR COMMENTS FROM SAME USER ID AGAIN AND AGAIN ALL OVER AGAIN, , , , , , NOW THEY BEEN CAUGHT, , SO THEY WILL MAKE ANOTHER ID AND WRITE POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT THEM SELVES, , , , ,
DO NOT BELIEVE ANY THING WHAT THEY WRITE ANY MORE ...!!!
YOU BA******S STOP WRITING A LIE AND STOP CHEATING PEOPLE, GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK NOW, , , , NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
SUCH A STUPID [censored]S
REPORT TO BUR DUBAI POLICE NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...⇄
I HAVE VISITED LAWYERS OFFICE IN DUBAI, , , , , Galadari and Associates, Advocates and Legal Consultants, , , Tel: +[protected]
Galadari and Associates Building
Al Ghubaibah Road
Opposite UAE Central Bank
Dubai
PO Box 7992
Dubai
IF ANY ONE WANTS TO FILE THE FRAUD CASE IN UAE COURT OF LAW, THAN, , YOU GET 11% OF ONE YEARS COMPENSATION, IF YOU ARE WAITING SINCE 2 YEARS THAN 22% THAN IT GETS MORE AND MORE, , , , PLUS THE TOTAL AMOUNT, , , , CAN ONLY BE AGAINST THE COMPANY IN UAE...
COMPANY OR ARABIC SPONSOR WILL PAY FOR THIS……………YOU WILL GET THE MONEY BACK…
DO IT NOW BEFORE ITS TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LATEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE...
bla bla bla, [censored] you and your notie, you sent the samer by email to all dubai clients but u never answer the phone or the emails. GO TO HELL!!!
Sumit sen, I am opening a case against you in CSIC Canada! YOU ARE A LIAR! any time we called your Canada branch you didn't answer or you were not in the office! after they wipe you out of the list of CSIC because of FRAUD AND CHEATING YOU WILL LEARN HOW TO DEAL WITH PEOPLE!
I also made a case against you in Dubai ! hope to see you in the court soon!
I will follow this case strictly cause I have the money and connections to sue you and you will be in big trouble! Amina didn't left the office just like that! She knew that there are many complaints against you! and you know that Dubai is not a safe place for your cheating anymore! soon it will be the same in Canada!
I'm following your case STRICTLY IN DUBAI AND CANADA! with all the papers I have against you I'm pretty sure that the end is coming for you soon!
I also made a case against you in Dubai ! hope to see you in the court soon!
I will follow this case strictly cause I have the money and connections to sue you and you will be in big trouble! Amina didn't left the office just like that! She knew that there are many complaints against you! and you know that Dubai is not a safe place for your cheating anymore! soon it will be the same in Canada!
I'm following your case STRICTLY IN DUBAI AND CANADA! with all the papers I have against you I'm pretty sure that the end is coming for you soon!
Mahnaz letter are all lies and just trying to fool us, Once i called and fortunately 1 lady answered but she is so rude by telling me that Sumit is not around and no one can assist me. I've been contacting them again and no response. I sent a messages/emails but no response. It's ridiculous and so shameless of them by posting a letter and assuring us that they can do it directly to Canada. Forgive me but i am cursing them for cheating so many people. How these heartless and greedy people can sleep without thinking that all their victims including their families are suffering right now because of them.
In my case I paid 11, 000dhs for nothing and It's been 3yrs now since they got money from me and unfortunately nothing happened. God forgive THEM, and i believe in KARMA.
Anyway, i am planning to file a complaint but i dont know where should i go.. Is it necessary to go to Bur Dubai station? or shall i hire a legal office?
Pls adv.
thanks
Chie
In my case I paid 11, 000dhs for nothing and It's been 3yrs now since they got money from me and unfortunately nothing happened. God forgive THEM, and i believe in KARMA.
Anyway, i am planning to file a complaint but i dont know where should i go.. Is it necessary to go to Bur Dubai station? or shall i hire a legal office?
Pls adv.
thanks
Chie
Sen Consultancy — fraud company
finally all the allegations has come true,(Sen Immigration Dubai IS CLOSED and they ran away from UAE ALSO LIKE INDIA AND MANY OTHER COUNTRIES.. i am ALOS a victim of arrange employment and paid £3000 for that, nearly 18th months and nothing happens, i requested the money back by Dubai office, a branch manager name AIMNA so i was told by her that' your money will be refunded when sumit is back to office since he is travelling a broad, i called few time in Dubai office and no answer and today i visited the Dubai office, and this is the notice was on the door,,I went to Bur dubai police station and complained, they are looking in to,,TO ALL UAE VICTIMS KINDLY GO AND COMPLAIN BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.Dubai police is good, if more complains than this will be BIG amount so they can report him to INTER-POLE ANS BRING HIM TO DUBAI TO PAY BACK ALL THE INNOCENT PEOPLES.Notice Says..
All existing clients who signed the retainer agreement with SEN. IMMIGRATION, kindly contact the Head office in Toronto on the contact information provided below. If you have require any information regarding your application, please make a Note of this details only DO NOT REMOVE.
Sumit Sen.
Former United Nations lawyer
Rhodes Scholar in International Immigration Law at London School of Economics
Member, Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC Professional License M042172)
President and CEO
SEN. IMMIGRATION: The International Immigration Firm
Ellesmere Professional Centre
1920 Ellesmere Road, Suite 209
Toronto, ON M1H 2V6. Canada
(T) +[protected], Mobile[protected]
[protected]@SenImmigration.com
www.SenImmigration.com
HOME NUMBER[protected]
Mahnaz Sen.
Executive Director
(T[protected] Mobile[protected]
(E) [protected]@SenImmigration.com
Tanu Trilokia
Manager, Employer Relations Division
[protected] Mobile[protected]
[protected]@SenImmigration.com (E), www.SenImmigration.com (W)