In the first class itself while teaching about body language and face expressions, the teacher showed video of Malala Day and introduced the idea of terrorist to my 9 years old. When he enquired about who a terrorist is, the teacher started telling about Malala's story and told the child that "NOW Kashmir has become part of India sometime back"... While I was still wondering about the choice of video to explain the public speaking methods, this statement was too much to take. At this I objected and asked her to state the correct facts that "Kashmir has always been a part of India". After trying to give false reasons a few times, she finally accepted.
I dint make any point about the choice of video during the class. However, it is important for everyone to know where planet spark is trying to take the minds of young children. Why did the teacher make a statement like "Kashmir is now a part of India"? Doesn't everyone know that Kashmir was always an integral part of India. Was this information helpful? | 
Post your Comment