I live in Australia and have been watching this show for a very long time.
Last year the final winner was Krishang.
I have much respect and appreciation for him, considering his illness.
The point I wish to highlight here is this:
The programme is to identify, appreciate and encourage the talents.
I sincerely thought that Trinita, and couple of other girls (forgot the names), were blessed with much more singing talents and passion.
But the judges as well as the voters, gave importance to sympathy rather than singing talent, in the sense that Krishang's unfortunate set back in his health, finally won him the result.
That means, the next time a blind singer or an orphan performs, they are bound to win, rather than the real talent.
This show is not a platform to recognise misfortunes, but the talent for singing.
Hence, I feel that I have wasted my precious time, despite constraints in free time, of life living abroad.
For all that brilliant talent, Trinita should have been compensated adequately.
If the judges decided on sympathy by declaring Krishan as the winner, then they failed to realise how much Trinita and her parents must have felt the pain, for having taken so much of trouble of relocating to Chennai from Bangalore.
I have no connection at all with Trinita nor with anyone else.
I expected the show to be a real boost and blessing to all the contestants.
That's all.
I'm sure that the show is for social causes of sympathy and misfortune.
John Peyton
Was this information helpful?
Post your Comment