Union Public Service Commission [UPSC] — unfair in shortlisting for interview (advt no 06/2017) for the post asst. commissioner

Address:

New Delhi, Delhi

I applied for the post of assistant commissioner (Nrm/rfs), advertised by upsc (Advt. No. 06/2017; vacancy no. [protected]). My roll no is 239 (Application no [protected]) as mentioned in the scrutiny file uploaded on upsc website. For the process of shortlisting, upsc increased the desirable experience from 03 years to 06 years. Here i want to mention that (1) online application format for the same as well as in the advertisement, it was not mentioned that phd research work should also be mentioned in experience column. (2) sir, i have mentioned ph. D under additional qualification as m. Sc degree has been asked as essential qualification. Since only 3 years of experience was asked in advertisement and i fulfilled the same. But i[censored]psc had changed its criteria for shortlisting then it should have given an opportunity to candidates to clarify their stand. Further, as per ugc regulation, phd research work is considered as research experience. Apart from my ph. D years, i have teaching and research experience of 5 years and 4 months and counting my ph. D the total will be 8 years and 4 months. My application has been rejected by neither counting those experiences nor putting a query regarding it before taking a final decision. (3) in advertisement phd should be kept as desirable but candidates even without phd degree have been called for interview.