[Resolved] Lic Of India — LIC - ULIP PLAN - SURRENDER VALUE RECEIVED LESS THAN PRINCIPAL | |||
Date 12th January, 2012. To, The Branch Manager, LIC, Panvel Branch, Panvel. Dist Raigad, Thane. SUB ULIP PLAN - SURRENDER VALUE RECEIVED LESS THAN PRINCIPAL Dear sir, This is KL Gaikwad LIC agent from Panvel Branch with working since last 5 yrs. I brought various clients under ULIP Plans and I would like to bring your attention towards their policy returns. After three years of time period when some of them requested for surrender their policies, they learnt that instead of earning any interest on it they have lost 17-20% of their basic principle invested. For example in below chart we have found that one of policy holder who has invested of Rs. 30,000/- (Premium amt 10,000/-X 3 yrs) and after completion of 3 years he received only of Rs. 24,913/-. Sr No. ULIP Policy No. Policy starts dtd. Surrender dtd. Policy principle amt invested Surrender value recd 1 [protected] 14.08.2007 24.11.2011 30,000.00 24,913.00 2 [protected] 14.08.2007 24.11.2011 30,000.00 25568.00 Kindly refer following chart; All above are invested in LIC for short term with hoping it’s a Govt sector and would give better interest money than other banks & Post office. After three years of investment when some of them went for surrender they found shocking & unexpected result. On their investment they have earned zero interest money and at the same time they have lost 17-20% of their basic principle. I personally was not expected that they will lose their principle amount. As per my knowledge they should get at least their principle amount after 3 yrs of investment. On behalf of my clients I would like state you that it has happened not in single case but with everyone who surrendered recently. And other who not yet surrendered are also scared & expressing their unhappiness towards LIC. Please understand the fact above that all that have taken these ULIP Policies & surrendered above are unskilled & from poor family background. They suspended their children’s education and saved the money & invested in LIC. And this result is entirely unexpected. They are very much unhappy & literally they are crying. I too am surprised with this result. At least they should get their invested principle amount. We had bad experience when we taken this matter to Panvel Branch Officer Mr Patil few days back. And he simply refused to entertain us in fact he blamed us that policy holders accepted the terms & condition with signing application form. He completely raises his hand in this circumstance. Sir, On behalf of my all clients I request you to please reconsider the matter above with revising the surrender value with appropriate returns. And I hope you will understand the matter and shall do the needful for us. I have enclosed here the copies of cheques & surrender details for your kind reference. Thanking you, Yours truly, KL Gaikwad Was this information helpful? | |||
Aug 13, 2020 Complaint marked as Resolved | |||
1 Comment | |||
Comments
36%
Complaints
6212
Pending
0
Resolved
2214
+91 22 2217 8600
+91 75 5267 6254
LIC Central Office, 2nd Floor, Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400021
ulip child plan — misguidance
i m rajesh kumar s/o sh.vipan kumar under proposal policy no:LL15440217, recepit date :05/11/2008 & no: 60475298.we didn't recevied the policy yet. its period of five months that we are being in touch with your marketing finnancial service consultant, but thear was no response from their end, after getting the amount of 5000/- frome usits realy shameful speech for the company that they have recuirted the non eligeble person/staff in the company, they make pepole fool to get policy ...kindly make positive rules according to RBI GIUDELINE, that no one should be cheaterd or spoiled.
as per discussion kindly remit/refund my all payment.
thanks & regads
rajesh kumar
124, gali no: 3, S.U.S colony,
o/s gate khazanna, amritsar, , , PUNJAB
#[protected]
MISGIUDENCE
ADD:ICICI PRU LIFE
MR. LALIT UPADHAYAY
NODAL NEW, AMRITSAR
#[protected]