[Resolved]  Mykarsol Technologies — Harrasement for fees

Jun 11, 2014

mykarsol technologies's response myself yogesh [protected]@mykarsol technologies want to clearify that we can provide any details to any body to prove our quailty of education.we r into this bussiness from last 14 years and we can provide list of all students who had got training from my place.and they r satisfiied.some exception are always there.we can clearify this issue before anybody.any body will be welcomed.my contact number is [protected] and my url is "www.mykarsoltechnologies.com"

Jun 11, 2014

mykarsol technologies's response myself yogesh chaudhary ownner of mykarsol technologies want to say that this student had got education from my place since his/her diploma.i have all proof that i had trained this student his/her diploma course too. if i were not good why this student taken admission again at my place.i am ready to give my clarification at any stage before anybody....its my request to all of you who is visiting this fourm plz dont believe and also listen my views.......thank u

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response By yogesh [protected]@mykarsol technologies After rationalizing aforesaid matter, it clearly seems to be a pseudo complain that has been made with an intention to defame the institution for some personal grudges. The following are the reasons; logical enough to have lucid view to consider this matter to be a completely pseudo and an act of an immature and dissatisfied person with a childish mindset. 1. Regarding Harassment and torture to the students for fees. The complainer himself/herself has admitted that he/she has not paid the fees amounted Rs. 4000/-. If an institution asks a student to pay the remaining fees, it, in no situation, can be considered as harassment. Reminders for the full payment is quite genuine and professional act. If reminding for paying the full fees is to be considered as harassment, all the professionals would come under the harassment cases. This is supported by Indian Law too. If a passenger doesn't pay the tariff, he/ she is entitled either for punishment or for fine. Schools also become helpless to give admission or to continue the admission if a student is not able to pay the fees. In alignment to this, I have a question to this complainer, what if he/ she had not paid the fees to his/her institution, would his/her institution have allowed him/her to continue his/her studies? 2. Regarding the threat for not giving Certificate The complainer has stated that he/she was threatened for not giving certificate. This is again an unethical demand on any student's part if he/she asks for certificate when he/she has not paid the fees. This is something like a customer starts feeling his/her right over the things for which he/she has not been able to make the full payment. Rather this seems to be ridiculous on a part of somebody who expects and feels it to be his/her right to get certificate even though he/ she has not paid the fees. Even Schools and Colleges too do not allow the students to appear in the exam if they have not been able to pay the fees. Hence, it is fair enough on the part of institution if it has taken a decision not to issue the certificate to such candidate who has not paid the fees. 3. Regarding a faculty named Minaz being poorly skilled and not providing proper guidance This kind of complain against a faculty in such e-forum seems to have mal-intention. The complainer could not provide clarity how he/she could conclude the faculty to be poorly skilled or not giving proper guidance. We can see many students have revealed their appreciation for the same faculty. 4. Regarding informing in the Complainer's College not to let him/her appear in the exam. The complainer has stated that he/she was threatened that his/her college will be informed and would not be allowed to appear in the exam. Now, I must say that the complainer is quite immature and lacks intellectuality to take such things into so much consideration to identify it as a threat because it is a matter of simple logic that no institution can be so improfessional to consider the opinions of outsiders to allow its students to appear in the exam. Even if a students has not paid the fees in his/ her tuition classes, institution has to allow him/her to appear in the exam if he/she has fulfilled the eligibility conditions of the institution. If the complainer has got threatened with such sayings, the complainer's own maturity is doubtful. Hence, with the aforesaid reasons, this complain must be considered fake that has been done by an immature student who has wrong intention to defame the institution for his/her personal grudges. In fact, the institution can sue this complainer to the court under making an attempt to defame the institution because of some personal grudges. Also, I have a request to such e-forum ( which is indeed a good attempt in the direction of consumer protection ) to analyse the complain with scrutiny and then let it be displayed through the forum in a proper shape and not haphazardly so that authenticity of the e-forum does not get questioned. At the same time I heartily appreciate an attempt to add the comments on the complain. Thanks & Regards

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response By yogesh [protected]@mykarsol technologies[protected]---After rationalizing aforesaid matter, it clearly seems to be a pseudo complain that has been made with an intention to defame the institution for some personal grudges. The following are the reasons; logical enough to have lucid view to consider this matter to be a completely pseudo and an act of an immature and dissatisfied person with a childish mindset.

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response countinued-------1. Regarding Harassment and torture to the students for fees.[protected] The complainer himself/herself has admitted that he/she has not paid the fees amounted Rs. 4000/-. If an institution asks a student to pay the remaining fees, it, in no situation, can be considered as harassment. Reminders for the full payment is quite genuine and professional act. If reminding for paying the full fees is to be considered as harassment, all the professionals would come under the harassment cases. This is supported by Indian Law too. If a passenger doesn't pay the tariff, he/ she is entitled either for punishment or for fine. Schools also become helpless to give admission or to continue the admission if a student is not able to pay the fees. In alignment to this, I have a question to this complainer, what if he/ she had not paid the fees to his/her institution, would his/her institution have allowed him/her to continue his/her studies?

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response countinued-------1. Regarding Harassment and torture to the students for fees.[protected] 2. Regarding the threat for not giving Certificate The complainer has stated that he/she was threatened for not giving certificate. This is again an unethical demand on any student's part if he/she asks for certificate when he/she has not paid the fees. This is something like a customer starts feeling his/her right over the things for which he/she has not been able to make the full payment. Rather this seems to be ridiculous on a part of somebody who expects and feels it to be his/her right to get certificate even though he/ she has not paid the fees. Even Schools and Colleges too do not allow the students to appear in the exam if they have not been able to pay the fees. Hence, it is fair enough on the part of institution if it has taken a decision not to issue the certificate to such candidate who has not paid the fees.

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response countinued-------3. Regarding a faculty named Minaz being poorly skilled and not providing proper guidance[protected] This kind of complain against a faculty in such e-forum seems to have mal-intention. The complainer could not provide clarity how he/she could conclude the faculty to be poorly skilled or not giving proper guidance. We can see many students have revealed their appreciation for the same faculty.

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response countinued-------4. Regarding informing in the Complainer's College not to let him/her appear in the exam. The complainer has stated that he/she was threatened that his/her college will be informed and would not be allowed to appear in the exam. Now, I must say that the complainer is quite immature and lacks intellectuality to take such things into so much consideration to identify it as a threat because it is a matter of simple logic that no institution can be so improfessional to consider the opinions of outsiders to allow its students to appear in the exam. Even if a students has not paid the fees in his/ her tuition classes, institution has to allow him/her to appear in the exam if he/she has fulfilled the eligibility conditions of the institution. If the complainer has got threatened with such sayings, the complainer's own maturity is doubtful.

Jun 12, 2014

yogesh7777's response countinued-------Hence, with the aforesaid reasons, this complain must be considered fake that has been done by an immature student who has wrong intention to defame the institution for his/her personal grudges. In fact, the institution can sue this complainer to the court under making an attempt to defame the institution because of some personal grudges. Also, I have a request to such e-forum ( which is indeed a good attempt in the direction of consumer protection ) to analyse the complain with scrutiny and then let it be displayed through the forum in a proper shape and not haphazardly so that authenticity of the e-forum does not get questioned. At the same time I heartily appreciate an attempt to add the comments on the complain. Thanks & Regards

Jun 13, 2014

yogesh7777's response Since the whole complain is fake, it doesn't require any further clarifications on any of the concerns put up here.including the concern regarding our Software Professional Minaz too. But still, for the sake of truth, we need to put our feedback for her. Minaz is the founding member of My Karsol technologies and her contribution in the development has been substantial as well as remarkable.She is very amiable in nature and her perseverance and learnedness has always been appreciated both by, the colleagues and students. Of course she is a hard task master but she believes in the principles of motivation and inspiration for the better learning of the students. She has an impression of being very genuine and soft hearted on all the trainees