Ministry Of Finance Govt. Of India — income tax evasion petition and tax recovery on 53 lacks | |||
The Under Secretary 18-7-18 Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Room No.55 North Block New Delhi – 110001 Subject: Income Tax Evasion Petition and Tax Recovery on Rs.53 (Fifty three) Lacks against Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal R/o 19, Vardhman Vihar colony, Gaytri Nagar, Ajmer Road, Beawar-305901, Distt. Ajmer, Rajasthan PAN NO. ADFPK5989G. Dear Sir/Madam, This is to inform you that, Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal has been evading Taxes & has not been disclosing the expenses to the Income Tax Authorities & hampering the investigation through his links. Background 1. Smt. Anisha Khandelwal D/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal has framed a Dowry complaint under section 498a/323/406 of IPC and under Dowry Prohibition act 1961. It has been claimed by Smt. Anisha Khandelwal in her own Admission that her parents i.e. Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal & Smt. Nirmala Khandelwal had spent over Rs. 60 (Sixty) lacks in the marriage on[protected] Financial year[protected]. 2. Please refer to my correspondence held with offices concerning the jurisdiction of the Person, who has committed fraud & has misled the Income Tax Officials. 3. COPY OF CORRESPONDANCE HAD WITH INCOME TAX OFFICIALS ON THE MATTER IS ATTACHED HEREWITH WITH THIS APPLICATION IN “ANNEXURE- A” FOR YOU’RE PERSUAL Ground for complaint 1. As per information made available by the employer of Sh. Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal (A.V.V.N.L.) it’s clearly indicates that in financial year 2014-15 Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwakl income as per income tax records was only Rs. 7 (Seven) lacks and he Has Not shown any expenses of marriage & Smt, Nirmala Khandelwal is a house wife and She do not have any source of income BUT as per FIR they have spend Rs, 60 (Sixty) lacks in her daughter Anisha Khnadelwal marriage. 2. Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal has unaccountable flow of income which is not Shown anywhere in the Income Tax returns. I request the learned Income Tax Authorities to look into the matter by verifying cash flow history of Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal, so as to recover valuable revenue in the form of Income tax, This has been concealed from the tax Authorities with malafide intentions of Cheating with the Government machinery. 3. As per section 133(5) of Income tax Act it is mandatory to file income tax return on The expenditure incurred on marriage. 4. As Shri Dimnesh Kumar Khandelwal (as claimed) had spent Rs60 (Sixty) lacks in Financial Year 2014-15 and his income as per Income tax return is Rs. 7 (Seven) Lacks, since he has not disclosed the expenses occurred in her daughter’s marriage And source of fund of Rs 60 (Sixty) lacks, it means, the balance amount i.e. 53 (Fifty Three) lacks may be a black money on which Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal has not Paid INCOME & OTHER APPLACABLE taxes, I request to authorities that tax and Penalties should be collected as per provision of Income Tax Act. 5. Further careful perusal of the FIR attached hints provision of section 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C & 69D under Income Tax Act of 1961 are applicable on Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal as far as in my knowledge. However there may be many other provisions Of income tax which is best known to Honorable Income tax authority. 6. The section 68 deals with cash credits proving identity of the creditor, capacity of the Creditor, genuineness of the transaction is the important things of this section. Section 69 & 69A, B deals with unexplained investment, unexplained money & Investment not fully disclosed in books of accounts. 7. Section 69C deals with the unexplained expenditure, the important requirement of This section is that an expenditure has been found to have been incurred by an Assesses in any financial year and the assesses fails to indicate satisfactory source of Such expenditure. But I believe till date no action has been taken against Shri DINESH Kumar Khnadelwal to recover the income tax, wealth tax & other tax on Rs.53 (Fifty Three) Lacks. Request & Relief sought 1. Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal & Smt Nirmala Khandelwal, may give a baseless plea That the F.I.R. is not done by them, because the FIR has taken place through Upper Judicial Magistrate, Beawar whom they have requested for FIR in the application Submitted by Smt. Anisha Khandelwal D/o Shri. Dinesh Kumar Khnadelwal, further Misusing & misguiding the Government Machinery. 2. Shri Dinesh Kumar Khnadelwal, may misguide to the Income Tax Authorities with malafide intentions of cheating with the Government machinery by evading taxes and Also evading all kinds of wealth tax, luxury tax. 3. Shri Dinesh Kumar Khandelwal income and source of fund is Rs.7 (Seven) lacks only As per income tax records in financial year 2014-15, Kindly recover the tax on Rs. 53 (Fifty Three) lacks and start proceedings against Shri Dinesh Kumar Khnadelwal as Per provision of Income Tax and the authority is under bounden duty, since it relates And its refusal may prejudice the appellant upon which an FIR has been registered. 4. I may be given the due prize money as per income tax guidelines for Revealing this to the authorities. 5. I request the authorities to kindly intervene & investigate the matter as it Causing huge revenue loss of Rs. About 30 (Thirty) Lacks and other Applicable penalties better known to authorities. 6. I request you to initiate investigation through appointing High Level IRS To recover the revenue in the form of Taxes from ShriDinesh Kumar Khnadelwal. Thanking You yours sincerely, (Suresh Chand Gupta) 63/86, Heera Path, Madhyam Marg, Mansarover, Jaipur-302020 Cellular No- [protected] Enclosed: As above Cc: Was this information helpful? | |||
Add a Comment | |||
Post your Comment