@cbse,
My student had appeared for the aissce 2019 physics (Subject code-042) conducted by u people on 5/3/19. It is extremely annoying and disgusting to mention that you have failed miserably in maintaining a uniform difficulty level among the different sets in physics - so, basic purpose of conducting a fair public examination is not achieved.
The sole purpose of having multiple sets is known - to check malpractices. But considering all the measures that u had undertaken at the examination centre, different sets having same question but in different sequence would have sufficed the purpose.
But sets 2 [question code - 55/1/2] and set 3[question code 55/4/3] differ in every aspect - in terms of difficulty level, length, all questions (Except one 5 mark part numerical on 'combination of lenses'). Set 2 contained all definitive, straight-forward, direct, marks fetching questions.
1. Set 3 contained even one numerical on 'ce transistor' while no numerical from 'semiconductor' was asked in set 2.
2. Even for question on 'moving coil galvanometer', set 2 asked simply the 'principle, voltage-current sensitivity definition. On the other hand, set 3 asked one numerical on 'range of ammeter'.
3. Set 3 did not contain even contain a single ques from transformer while a 5 mark direct question is asked in set 2! All the altenatives even differ! I had been also informed that set 1 was very lenient.
It is extremely unfair that students sitting in the same room, appearing for the same exam, conducted by the same board are being assessed differently. However, the mark will be given and thus results will be published along with discrepancies thus mentioned. Set 2 contained all direct ques.
How can u play with the futures of lakhs of candidates??? Physics, chemistry, bio, maths grades are important for admissions to every colleges nationwide. It is to bring this to your notice that even grace marks cannot compensate for the goo[censored]p. Not only that this pattern will play a havoc on moral and confidence of the examinee. Being a apex body in our country you cannot indulge in anything with invites favoritism to a section of examinee.
So i request you fervently to contemplate on the re-examination of physics [subject code 042] for providing a level platform for all the students.
Thanks and regards,
Dipesh
Central Board of Secondary Education [CBSE] customer support has been notified about the posted complaint.
There was a mistake in CBSE Accountancy, which was held on 6th March 2019, question paper set 2 question number 15 relating to NPO chapter that the date of balance sheet was given end of 31st March 2018 intead of 2017. and in Receipts and Payments account it was given date of payment of purchase of computers 1.10.2018 which was after the ending date final account preparation. Please consider this mistake and bring to the notice to CBSE authorities. Thank you.