Comments
Comments
4 minutes ago by Nitin [send email]
1. That the petitioner was the registered consumer of electricity connections bearing K. No.s[protected] I. P. &[protected] I. L. (now [protected]) installed at above-mentioned address. The connections were sanctioned for industrial purpose for a load of 14.92 KW (IP) & 1 KW (IL) and were being used as such and there was no misuse.
2. That as the petitioner did not require the said connections further, he accordingly made a request with the respondent for permanent disconnection of the said connections & removal of the meters vide his letter dated 20.07.2002. The said request was duly received by the respondent on the same day.
3. That after the receipt of the said request, respondent sent the bills against the above-stated connections with due date of 30.10.2002. In the said bills, current reading against the IP connection was shown as 25480 & against the IL connection was shown as 2003. Both the bills were duly paid by the petitioner. Thus all the dues till that date were cleared by the petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner did not receive any bill against the said connections.
4. That the petitioner even did not use the above-stated electricity connections thereafter.
5. That the respondent without any rhyme and reason, unnecessarily delayed the removal of the meters against both the above-stated electricity connections and the meters were removed by the respondent only on 22.08.2003, i.e. after a delay of more than one year after the receipt of the request of disconnection, without any justification and without any fault on the part of the petitioner.
6. That the petitioner on 23.02.2004 represented the respondent regarding refund of the security amount deposited by the respondent against the said connections as the said connections were already disconnected permanently and the meters against the same were also removed and the bills sent by the respondent were paid by the respondent but the respondent paid no heed to the legitimate requests of the petitioner.
7. That the respondent suddenly sent a notice dated 25.03.2009 to the petitioner wherein an outstanding amount of Rs. 50, 470/- was shown as arrears in his name against the K.No. [protected] which connection was already permanently disconnected by the respondent on the request of the petitioner after the clearance of the outstanding electricity bills.
8. That the petitioner was shocked to see the said notice as he himself got the meters disconnected after payment of all the pending dues. When he contacted the district office of the respondent, he was handed over a copy of the bill against the above-stated electricity connection showing the outstanding arrears as Rs. 50, 476.65 which is absolutely illegal and unjustified in view of the facts mentioned above.
9. That the respondent again sent a notice dated 02.04.2009 to the father of the petitioner to transfer the alleged illegal dues wrongly shown in the name of petitioner to the existing electricity connection of the father of the petitioner.
10. That the respondent since then is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and his father and is extending the threats of disconnection of electricity of the connection of the father of the petitioner.
11. That, however, the petitioner in order to buy peace tried to settle the matter with the respondent in the Permanent Lok Adalat, Mata Sundri Lane, New Delhi. The matter could not be settled there due to adamant attitude of the respondent.
12. That the petitioner is not liable to make any payment in respect of any fixed or minimum guarantee charges accrued after 20.07.2002 i.e. after the date of request of the petitioner for the removal of meters and for permanent disconnection of the electricity connections.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Forum may be pleased to: -
a) Quash the illegal bill of Rs. 50, 476.65 raised by the respondent against K. No. [protected], being illegal and arbitrary and not payable by the petitioner at all;
b) Direct the respondent not to disconnect the electricity of any other electricity connection existing at the property bearing no. Kh. No. 68/1, Village Bhorgar, Narela, Delhi-40 on the basis of the alleged dues against the K. No. [protected];
HOW AM I WRONG.
4 minutes ago by Nitin [send email]
1. That the petitioner was the registered consumer of electricity connections bearing K. No.s[protected] I. P. &[protected] I. L. (now [protected]) installed at above-mentioned address. The connections were sanctioned for industrial purpose for a load of 14.92 KW (IP) & 1 KW (IL) and were being used as such and there was no misuse.
2. That as the petitioner did not require the said connections further, he accordingly made a request with the respondent for permanent disconnection of the said connections & removal of the meters vide his letter dated 20.07.2002. The said request was duly received by the respondent on the same day.
3. That after the receipt of the said request, respondent sent the bills against the above-stated connections with due date of 30.10.2002. In the said bills, current reading against the IP connection was shown as 25480 & against the IL connection was shown as 2003. Both the bills were duly paid by the petitioner. Thus all the dues till that date were cleared by the petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner did not receive any bill against the said connections.
4. That the petitioner even did not use the above-stated electricity connections thereafter.
5. That the respondent without any rhyme and reason, unnecessarily delayed the removal of the meters against both the above-stated electricity connections and the meters were removed by the respondent only on 22.08.2003, i.e. after a delay of more than one year after the receipt of the request of disconnection, without any justification and without any fault on the part of the petitioner.
6. That the petitioner on 23.02.2004 represented the respondent regarding refund of the security amount deposited by the respondent against the said connections as the said connections were already disconnected permanently and the meters against the same were also removed and the bills sent by the respondent were paid by the respondent but the respondent paid no heed to the legitimate requests of the petitioner.
7. That the respondent suddenly sent a notice dated 25.03.2009 to the petitioner wherein an outstanding amount of Rs. 50, 470/- was shown as arrears in his name against the K.No. [protected] which connection was already permanently disconnected by the respondent on the request of the petitioner after the clearance of the outstanding electricity bills.
8. That the petitioner was shocked to see the said notice as he himself got the meters disconnected after payment of all the pending dues. When he contacted the district office of the respondent, he was handed over a copy of the bill against the above-stated electricity connection showing the outstanding arrears as Rs. 50, 476.65 which is absolutely illegal and unjustified in view of the facts mentioned above.
9. That the respondent again sent a notice dated 02.04.2009 to the father of the petitioner to transfer the alleged illegal dues wrongly shown in the name of petitioner to the existing electricity connection of the father of the petitioner.
10. That the respondent since then is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and his father and is extending the threats of disconnection of electricity of the connection of the father of the petitioner.
11. That, however, the petitioner in order to buy peace tried to settle the matter with the respondent in the Permanent Lok Adalat, Mata Sundri Lane, New Delhi. The matter could not be settled there due to adamant attitude of the respondent.
12. That the petitioner is not liable to make any payment in respect of any fixed or minimum guarantee charges accrued after 20.07.2002 i.e. after the date of request of the petitioner for the removal of meters and for permanent disconnection of the electricity connections.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Forum may be pleased to: -
a) Quash the illegal bill of Rs. 50, 476.65 raised by the respondent against K. No. [protected], being illegal and arbitrary and not payable by the petitioner at all;
b) Direct the respondent not to disconnect the electricity of any other electricity connection existing at the property bearing no. Kh. No. 68/1, Village Bhorgar, Narela, Delhi-40 on the basis of the alleged dues against the K. No. [protected];
HOW AM I WRONG.
i'm sudhir
Sir kuch to karo
Dear sirKya drama h ye camplaint no par baat karo to bolte h A block jao jhamgir puri sir kya ye hi kam rahe gaya h kya ab
Customer satisfaction rating Customer satisfaction rating is a complex algorithm that helps our users determine how good
a company is at responding and resolving complaints by granting from 1 to 5 stars for each
complaint and then ultimately combining them all for an overall score.
Read more
Read more
44%
Complaints
318
Pending
0
Resolved
139
View all 318 NDPL reviews & complaints
+91 11 6611 2222
Tatapower-DDL House, Hudson Lines, Kingsway Camp, Delhi, Delhi, India - 110009
View all NDPL contact information
2. That as the petitioner did not require the said connections further, he accordingly made a request with the respondent for permanent disconnection of the said connections & removal of the meters vide his letter dated 20.07.2002. The said request was duly received by the respondent on the same day.
3. That after the receipt of the said request, respondent sent the bills against the above-stated connections with due date of 30.10.2002. In the said bills, current reading against the IP connection was shown as 25480 & against the IL connection was shown as 2003. Both the bills were duly paid by the petitioner. Thus all the dues till that date were cleared by the petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner did not receive any bill against the said connections.
4. That the petitioner even did not use the above-stated electricity connections thereafter.
5. That the respondent without any rhyme and reason, unnecessarily delayed the removal of the meters against both the above-stated electricity connections and the meters were removed by the respondent only on 22.08.2003, i.e. after a delay of more than one year after the receipt of the request of disconnection, without any justification and without any fault on the part of the petitioner.
6. That the petitioner on 23.02.2004 represented the respondent regarding refund of the security amount deposited by the respondent against the said connections as the said connections were already disconnected permanently and the meters against the same were also removed and the bills sent by the respondent were paid by the respondent but the respondent paid no heed to the legitimate requests of the petitioner.
7. That the respondent suddenly sent a notice dated 25.03.2009 to the petitioner wherein an outstanding amount of Rs. 50, 470/- was shown as arrears in his name against the K.No. [protected] which connection was already permanently disconnected by the respondent on the request of the petitioner after the clearance of the outstanding electricity bills.
8. That the petitioner was shocked to see the said notice as he himself got the meters disconnected after payment of all the pending dues. When he contacted the district office of the respondent, he was handed over a copy of the bill against the above-stated electricity connection showing the outstanding arrears as Rs. 50, 476.65 which is absolutely illegal and unjustified in view of the facts mentioned above.
9. That the respondent again sent a notice dated 02.04.2009 to the father of the petitioner to transfer the alleged illegal dues wrongly shown in the name of petitioner to the existing electricity connection of the father of the petitioner.
10. That the respondent since then is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and his father and is extending the threats of disconnection of electricity of the connection of the father of the petitioner.
11. That, however, the petitioner in order to buy peace tried to settle the matter with the respondent in the Permanent Lok Adalat, Mata Sundri Lane, New Delhi. The matter could not be settled there due to adamant attitude of the respondent.
12. That the petitioner is not liable to make any payment in respect of any fixed or minimum guarantee charges accrued after 20.07.2002 i.e. after the date of request of the petitioner for the removal of meters and for permanent disconnection of the electricity connections.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Forum may be pleased to: -
a) Quash the illegal bill of Rs. 50, 476.65 raised by the respondent against K. No. [protected], being illegal and arbitrary and not payable by the petitioner at all;
b) Direct the respondent not to disconnect the electricity of any other electricity connection existing at the property bearing no. Kh. No. 68/1, Village Bhorgar, Narela, Delhi-40 on the basis of the alleged dues against the K. No. [protected];
HOW AM I WRONG.