| Address: Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh |
1. I took (26/2/2011)Tata Photon Plus internet connection with number No. [protected], going by the hype of fast connectivity in adds. Post paid plan with Rs. 250 monthly rent plus extra on uses basis was chosen, thinking uninterrupted service would be enjoyed though need was limited. However, write from the activation of services, too much disturbances/disconnection in internet connectivity was faced for which Customer care executive were spoken telephonically several times and was told to re-install the device/software off and on which had not served the purpose. However, First bill of Rs,315 (upto 12/3/11) was paid 31/3/11 while facing the problem and using internet elsewhere.
2. 5/4/11.Ultimately dealer (from whom the connection was purchased) was contacted who registered the complaint saying that there were no earlier complaints made telephonically with customer care registered in system. This was followed by written message/email that issue would be resolved within 24 hours by 6/4/11. Appointment for visit of engineer was fixed at 6 PM for 6/4/2011. Follow call was given by engineer also meet at appointed time but not turn up. He was contacted at 6.38 PM (6/4/2011) and assured me to reach around 7 pm but again not turn up and not intimated any reason for doing so. Thus, the assurance of resolving the issue by 6/4/11ended up without even attending the complaint.
3. 7/4/11 The engineers turned up and checked the connectivity on my desktop, on his laptop, keeping the laptop even on dinning table but problem of frequent disconnection remained. Device was taken by them and returned on 8/4/11 stating that the device is working well in other place and further intimating that he had noted down the parameters and would be sent to the company. Accessing the internet would be problem free after 9/4/11 afternoon onward, which had not happened. However, message/call/email about resolving the issue and closing the trouble ticket[protected] was made without actually resolving the issue.
4. 10-12/4/11 The issue of false claim of resolving the issue was raised with company for which I was told that engineer has given report like that and again registering the complain. Registering the new complaint 26080049 was questioned for which I was told that earlier complaint was registered in lower complaint department, this is(was) in higher complaint department/nodal officer side etc. However, on 12/4/11 nodal officer side tried to track the number on line and couldn’t resolve the issue. The engineer was sent same day and simultaneously other person from company side was also kept in touch of engineer (it was done on my request to avoid communication gap). The problem of dis-connectivity remained there for which they started pointing fault in my desktop. Whereas all feature of desktop were functioning well, including running the internet through mobile without any problem, in the presence of the engineer. On that, It was argued by them that desktop might be well but there is (was) problem with file relating to tataphon for which they don’t have solution, but vendor may have. This was ridiculous. Facts were emailed to notal officer on 13/4/11for taking device back and refund of money.
5. 15-20/4/11-Nodal officer responded with repeat version that problem in accessing internet was found due to some fault in your PC else the device was working fine on JE’s laptop. Though PC was ok, however, only as a step, operating system was got re-installed. But the problem of frequent dis-connectivity remained there. Allegation of fault in PC was baseless. It was also reminded to them that device was not working problem free on JEs laptop despite keeping it in different-2 places and that’s why device was taken by them to other place on 7/4/11 for checking. They were told that more than enough time, passing many 24 hours, has been given to resolve the issue, So I would not live with the problem/keep on striving for internet connectivity furthermore. Final/last bill (upto the date of written complaint) keeping in view that device was only on checking connectivity, was asked (20/4/11)to be issued for closing the account. On the contrary, willfully, one more complaint no.[protected] was registered (20/4/11) stating issue would be updated in next 3 days. With no, connection was asked (21/4/11) to disconnect.
6. 22-27/4/11-Not getting the proper response from company/nodal officer, dealer was asked as to why such connection was sold to me on which internet is not accessible despite engineer’s multiple visits. It was revealed by the him that in some places signal problem is there. Sometimes it is (was) expensive to provide signal booster. So company is taking the device back and making the refunds through cheques for which he is(was) recording the fact in system. Return of device/accessory and refund would be processed after receiving the approval from company. Subsequently, call from company was made that some representative would come to collect device and cheque for final bill amount Rs. 320 and refund of Rs. 1700 would be processed thereafter. Which was agreed but action was not taken as said.
7. 28/4/11- Instead, more calls from company/engineer to look the issue again/note down the signal parameters for sending the same to company, which(repeat) were denied know. It was clearly explained that the problems which could have resolved through customer care/ or within 24 hours one or more so, had not got resolved for weeks. Further, Not able to access internet through tataphon plus keep on attending call/engineer at premises was highly disturbing and resulting in generation of extra work without any good reason beyond limit Further calls/effort were said NO and again connection was told canceled from 21/4/11 and refunds was sought. Instead of closing the connection, problem was kept continue by registering one more complaint[protected] on their own, asking for 3 more days and stating (29/4/11) that “account has outstanding balance of Rs. 458 and due to system constraint we are unable to register the cancellation request till outstanding balance is reflecting”.
8. 2/5/11-On this, for speedy settlement, the company/nodal officer was given open option through tele-conver and written email 2/5/11 that outstanding may be adjusted from amount of Rs.1700 (due to me) and balance may be paid to me. Nothing was done except creating one more nuisance by willfully registering one more complaint[protected] and just like other complains closing it themselves later (6/5/11) by stereotype remark that “Hope you are satisfied with the resolution provided” without any resolution and lingering the matter further on.
9. On-line complaint 292385 through tataindicom site was made on 27/5/11 further complaint 294142 with above facts was again made on 31/5/11 to close issue but no response except issuing frequent bills even before/after this simply taking advantage/liberty of post paid connection as:
Bill date Amount Rs Bill date Amount Rs
15/4/11 458/320 15/5/11 646
15/6/11 503 15/7/11 No bill
15/8/11 160(seems to be prorata for 13/3/11 to 5/4/11—250/30X20 upto complaint date)
One of the email (3/6/11) from nodal officer stated that refund of device would be considered in cases issue is still persisting and not getting resolved. This was tata indicom, which had/was dragging the issue despite cancel request on 21/4/1, several tel-conver-reminder email in-between and refund sought. Instead closing the account with final bills, above bills were raised by adding monthly rental 250 (usage O-as) and raising the amount up and down with willful adjustment and without any good reason.
10. After long gap the bill of Rs. 160 (presumably prorata upto of registered complaint which I was readying since April, even little more for resolving issue but issue dragged by raising the bill first upward and so on) was sent and paid within due date on 18/8/11 and refunds was sought accordingly .
11. 22/8/11 I was respond (email) that “your complaint regarding buy back due to connectivity issue has been put before the concerned department. We have accorded it top priority “and on 23/8/11 that “for regarding refund you need to visit nearest Tata Office”. The concernd Dealer was visited on 4/9/1, who apprised me that in the absence of endorsement of refund order in his(dealer’s) system, he couldn’t take device/accessory back and proceed ahead with refunds (message in customer email would not be base). Tata indicom was asked (8/9/11&) endorse the same refund order to me (as a reference) which has been sent to dealer on 23/8/11 to bridge the gap or alternately told to collect the device from me and make the refund on-line (bank detail given)or by cheque to materialize the refund without causing further inconvenience. This was not done till date except again cheaply starting issuing fabricated bills (putting 0 usage+rental, taxes), on canceled/surrendered connection of 21/4/11. Then demanding payment as:
Bill date Amount Rs Bill date Amount Rs
15/9/11 276 15/10/11 602
12. The Tata indicom was again asked (17/1011) to endorse the refund order 23/8/11 to me for materializing the refund this not done but followed by email dated 19&20/10/11 that poorly accusing that I was not contactable on mobile registered with company. On contrary, several conservation on same mobile number taken place many times, selectively from company side only demanding bill and going silent/making call short on asking about refund. Last call from company No 64701760 on 7/11/11 5.43 pm was made that bill of Rs. 602 is pending for internet uses. This was in-correct/false statement and was counter as to where was the internet uses. Taking few minutes for checking the details of bill, she came with the version that she would revert back immediately. Gone missing since then till today 11/11/11 11.00am.
13. On the face, the company shown fixing appointment for providing resolution within 24 hours, sending engineers multiple times, offering/accepting buy back/refund- due to connectivity issue. But on back side not attending the complaint on appointed date, then claiming resolution without resolving the issue, then allegation of fault in customer’s PC without any fault noticed (not experienced with other ISP), then not resolving the issue on the pretext that issue is/was persisting-which dragged by themselves by issuing bill on post paid rental basis, then blaming the customer is not contactable on mobile.
14. The company was using all possible means of commutations as per requirement viz.i)Home address to send bill, ii)email was flooded with e-bills, bill dispatch intimation/payment alert and including above correspondences (even facts of tele-conver later including them in email), iii)mobile for tele-conversation and messages-not now. When it come to resolving the issue company look for baseless, cheap excuses. Not closing the issue/issuance of fabricated bills has caused huge disturbance/harassment and distress which were felt far more than which can be expressed in words. Lots of precious time has been wasted in responding the one sided dragged correspondence This was highly inappropriate/ disappointing/disgusting/condemnable on the part of TATA INDICOM to deal the issue like this. Tata indicom was not expected to go cheap to this extent.
15. It is again reminded to close issue by refunding Rs. 1700 without delay.
Vijay Singh Panwar
Ghaziabad. (U.P).
Date:11/11/11
Greetings from Tata Docomo!
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused to you.
We request you to kindly provide us your Tata Photon connection details, e-mail id or your alternate contact number which will assist us in doing the needful.
We assure you that we are committed to resolving the issue to your satisfaction.
Should you require any further assistance please mail us at Customer.[protected]@tatatel.co.in or you can call us on[protected].
Thanks and Regards,
Customer care
Tata Docomo.