Dec 15, 2017
Updated by chandra navin Letter /final / case/ answer/dpg/b/2017/82025/31/2017
date 09/12/2017
honerable sir
petisioner – Navin Chandra Pant
village – garau, post – devinagar,
distt – pithoragarh uttarakhand
pin 262531
verses
1- respondent honerable branch manager sbi kandey kiroli
2- respondent honerable agm sir almora
3- respondent honerable customer care of sbi
4- respondent honerable sir b.o. deharadune
5- respondent honerable sir b.o. kanpur
petisioner – navin Chandra pant
village – garaun
post – devinagar
distt – pithoragarh
uttarakhand pin 262531
honerable sir
(1) petisioner self write many complaint according to law and to prepare first document by rti and other law but ignore self document by sbi respondent officer . so iam in pressure to give this case in consumer forum but after 65 days respondent officer neglect himself document and safe respondent. So this case petisioner many time to try justice by department but department not accept his fault and punished only petisioner.
(2) The first loan is pmry plus scheme under13june 2005 letter no 1767/VII/85 m|ksx /2005 honerable mr sanjeev chopra in that time secretary o[censored]ttarakhand government --- means employment loan.
(3) This letter duty of bank 1, 2, 3 and next point these point is clear every third month report gone by bank so help the loan payee. But bank ignore and did not done his duty. This is the first point bank ignore . and lost about 50000 rupees to petisioner and this money gain business the petisioner. According to honerable RTI commissioner .
(4) Second point bank ignore in application the bank dept was 40000 rupees and self money was 160000 rupees bank signed loan document petisioner 160000 Rupees . they said according to bank document 160000 rupees and every time transfer the respondent bank manager to regist the petisioner. And safe. Here petisioner lost is 120000 rupees .according to the application after task force committee five member signature in loan application.
(5) Because petisioner was a successful business man and he ignore bank fault and give his instalement 4000 rupees . every time petisioner said but they cut only 2666 rupees and said this is your instalement . according to bank notice and according to loan management letter this is 2670 rupees.
(6) But above time I have no any complaint respondent manager sbi kandey kiroli I have no evidence so only talk is not accept by bank and many resistance create by bank to give prove.
(7) This account number [protected] in sbi kandey kiroli pmry plus loan account. Every time I talk to in that time bank manager mr ranjeet bhagat but they said loan condition is well and he gave me a cc limit account number [protected] this limit amount was 125000 rupees dated 5 january 2012 . and demand my asset 25000 rupees . and invest to prepare petisioner about 30000 rupees so side of business here lost of petisioner was 30000 rupees . and continue the account . so two loans pmry plus and one cc amount 125000 rupees running in first notice time . it means the account is well in date 5 january 2012. because mr honerable manager sbi kandey kiroli make a limit cc loan 125000 rupees.
(8) Suddenly honerable manager sbi kandey kiroli gave me a notice date 09/07/2012 write in notice sending date. But the account statement of that date saws well and no any fault. After I wrote a letter to honerable manager . sir clarify it but again he wrote in his hand writing terrible notice six page in sbi pad. It is clear loan payee have no fault . according to the evidence. Loan account statement and loan management letter. If the loan was according to bank documents.
9- So I wrote this complaint to ombuds man kanpur and sbi kandey kiroli make my another limit c c 3 lakhs and 125000 fill before limit and and one lakhs assets and 78000 fill it. it’s method I send an rti to give how it distribute this limit but they did not give me how he distribute but that is if iam faulted in pmry plus loan . but iam not faulted in this time by evidence but in that time I have no evidence . in this time evidence are (1) bank statement it is also in that time but bank not accept.(2) loan management letter it is in 2015 by rti they steal the evidence time to time and lost my about six year. At last the the DPG 14 november Branch has advised the customer that he should repay his previous loan first it is not based on this complaint about far and far I paid this loan after two illegal notice of bank. This decision is based on only revange and many blames so I file this case in consumer forum. Please accept and justice me I have no money to invest in the court . and bank benefit this condition and to search delay method every time. All evidence attach.